From: Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>
To: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@linux.dev>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v3 6/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2022-4543
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:00:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f7e2108248055e7ff9d8eb82086d745ee20fdea.camel@pbarker.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812072842.1176341-7-junjie.cao@linux.dev>
On Wed, 2026-08-12 at 02:28 -0500, Junjie Cao wrote:
> KPTI clones the kernel entry text into the user page tables at its
> KASLR-slid address and, on CPUs with PGE, sets the global bit on those
> PTEs. The mapping survives the CR3 write on kernel exit, and a local
> attacker can time prefetch instructions across the kernel range to
> recover the KASLR base in well under a second.
>
> Disclosure and write-up:
>
> https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/12/16/3
> https://www.willsroot.io/2022/12/entrybleed.html
>
> The disclosure states that after discussion with security@kernel.org and
> linux-distros "a fix for this is currently not available", and none has
> appeared since; arch/x86/mm/pti.c still clones the entry text and sets
> _PAGE_GLOBAL on the cloned PTEs. This is an unfixed issue, not a stated
> wontfix - Debian notes "Ignored upstream and KASLR is not expected to be
> resistant to local attacks", Ubuntu has it deferred since 2023-01-10:
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-4543
> https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-4543
>
> 97e3d26b5e5f ("x86/mm: Randomize per-cpu entry area", v6.2) randomizes
> the separate cpu_entry_area; it predates this disclosure and does not
> change the offset of entry_SYSCALL_64 from the KASLR base.
There's too much unnecessary detail here. Drop the mention of a commit
that doesn't fix the issue, you don't need to say "not a stated
wontfix", etc.
>
> CC: Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>
> AI-Generated: Uses Claude (claude-opus-5)
> Signed-off-by: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@linux.dev>
> ---
> v3:
> - use "unpatched" instead of "upstream-wontfix": the security-team
> discussion produced no clear wontfix decision
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/20260803084827.1348810-1-junjie.cao@linux.dev/
>
> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/cve-exclusion.inc | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/cve-exclusion.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/cve-exclusion.inc
> index b08eaa1..a909aef 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/cve-exclusion.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/cve-exclusion.inc
> @@ -229,3 +229,11 @@ was never substantiated and was closed as not-a-bug by Red Hat, SUSE and Debian"
> # Fix https://git.kernel.org/linus/d860d1faa6b2ce3becfdb8b0c2b048ad31800061
> # Fix https://git.kernel.org/linus/da9c9c877597170b929a6121a68dcd3dd9a80f45
> CVE_STATUS[CVE-2022-1247] = "fixed-version: Fixed from version 6.17"
> +
> +# "EntryBleed": KPTI maps the entry text into the user page tables with
> +# the global bit set, leaking the KASLR base by prefetch timing. Discussed
> +# with the kernel security team; no fix, KASLR is not treated as a boundary
> +# against local attackers. Distinct from CVE-2023-3640 (cpu_entry_area).
> +# https://www.willsroot.io/2022/12/entrybleed.html
> +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2022-4543] = "unpatched: no upstream fix, KASLR is not \
> +treated as a defence against local attackers"
Suggested wording, links and include triage date:
# Triaged August 2026 - "EntryBleed", discussed with the kernel security team
# but no fix appears to have been published since then. Debian says "Ignored
# upstream and KASLR is not expected to be resistant to local attacks", fix
# deferred in Ubuntu.
# https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/12/16/3
# https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-4543
# https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-4543
CVE_STATUS[CVE-2022-4543] = "unpatched: No fix has been proposed"
Best regards,
--
Paul Barker
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-16 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 7:28 [OE-core][PATCH v3 0/9] cve-exclusions: triage nine kernel CVEs lacking upstream fix data Junjie Cao
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 1/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2019-14899 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 15:50 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 2/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2021-3714 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 15:53 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 3/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2021-3864 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 15:55 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 4/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2022-0400 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 16:35 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 5/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2022-1247 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 16:21 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 6/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2022-4543 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 16:00 ` Paul Barker [this message]
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 7/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2023-3397 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 16:05 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 8/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2023-6238 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 16:11 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-12 7:28 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 9/9] cve-exclusions: set status for CVE-2023-6240 Junjie Cao
2026-08-16 16:14 ` Paul Barker
2026-08-16 16:39 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 0/9] cve-exclusions: triage nine kernel CVEs lacking upstream fix data Paul Barker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f7e2108248055e7ff9d8eb82086d745ee20fdea.camel@pbarker.dev \
--to=paul@pbarker.dev \
--cc=junjie.cao@linux.dev \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox