* [PATCH] matchbox-session: Should have high ALTERNATIE_PRIORITY than mini-x-session
@ 2012-09-06 21:58 Saul Wold
2012-09-06 22:03 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2012-09-06 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
By having a high priority it will be installed instead of the mini-x-session
when both are in a give set of packagegroups, as it stands now the
mini-x-session is installed by default on sato which is wrong!
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
---
.../matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
index f4be279..b9e83a5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "matchbox-common"
SRC_URI = "file://matchbox-session"
S = "${WORKDIR}"
-PR = "r3"
+PR = "r4"
inherit update-alternatives
ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "x-session-manager"
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[x-session-manager] = "${bindir}/matchbox-session"
-ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "10"
+ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100"
do_install() {
install -d ${D}/${bindir}
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] matchbox-session: Should have high ALTERNATIE_PRIORITY than mini-x-session
2012-09-06 21:58 [PATCH] matchbox-session: Should have high ALTERNATIE_PRIORITY than mini-x-session Saul Wold
@ 2012-09-06 22:03 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2012-09-06 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: Paul Eggleton, openembedded-core
On 09/06/2012 02:58 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> By having a high priority it will be installed instead of the mini-x-session
> when both are in a give set of packagegroups, as it stands now the
> mini-x-session is installed by default on sato which is wrong!
>
This issue occurred because during the packagegroup reorganization, the
mini-x-session was added to core-x11-base
The mini-x-session is really targeted for the build appliance and maybe
it's name caused some confusion. I would suggest we might want to
create a different x-session file for core-x11-base and/or rename the
mini-x-session, since it's not appropriate.
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
> index f4be279..b9e83a5 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
> @@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "matchbox-common"
> SRC_URI = "file://matchbox-session"
> S = "${WORKDIR}"
>
> -PR = "r3"
> +PR = "r4"
>
> inherit update-alternatives
>
> ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "x-session-manager"
> ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[x-session-manager] = "${bindir}/matchbox-session"
> -ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "10"
> +ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100"
>
> do_install() {
> install -d ${D}/${bindir}
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-06 22:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-06 21:58 [PATCH] matchbox-session: Should have high ALTERNATIE_PRIORITY than mini-x-session Saul Wold
2012-09-06 22:03 ` Saul Wold
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox