* Possible bug in bitbake
@ 2012-09-13 18:41 Otavio Salvador
2012-09-13 19:15 ` Mark Hatle
2012-09-13 23:45 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2012-09-13 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Rogerio Pimentel, Daiane Angolini
Hello,
Rogerio and Daiane, here copied, found a bug in bitbake (we managed to
reproduce it in denzil). The output in console when it happens can be
seen at:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/meta-fsl-arm/7W9bwxqslnk/htEiOcaJMH8J
The way to reproduce it is very easy:
* bitbake gnutls -c cleansstate
* remove gnutls from download cache
* bitbake gnutls
Adding gnutls back to download cache make the build succeed.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Possible bug in bitbake
2012-09-13 18:41 Possible bug in bitbake Otavio Salvador
@ 2012-09-13 19:15 ` Mark Hatle
2012-09-13 19:23 ` Saul Wold
2012-09-13 23:45 ` Paul Eggleton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hatle @ 2012-09-13 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 9/13/12 1:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Rogerio and Daiane, here copied, found a bug in bitbake (we managed to
> reproduce it in denzil). The output in console when it happens can be
> seen at:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/meta-fsl-arm/7W9bwxqslnk/htEiOcaJMH8J
>
> The way to reproduce it is very easy:
>
> * bitbake gnutls -c cleansstate
> * remove gnutls from download cache
> * bitbake gnutls
>
> Adding gnutls back to download cache make the build succeed.
>
There is a stamp file in the download cache. If you don't clear that, then it
will think it's still there.
bitbake gnutls -c distclean
that should remove from the download cache, the stamp file, and all of the
actions of cleansstate.
--Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Possible bug in bitbake
2012-09-13 19:15 ` Mark Hatle
@ 2012-09-13 19:23 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2012-09-13 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Hatle, Otavio Salvador
Cc: 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'
On 09/13/2012 12:15 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/13/12 1:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Rogerio and Daiane, here copied, found a bug in bitbake (we managed to
>> reproduce it in denzil). The output in console when it happens can be
>> seen at:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/meta-fsl-arm/7W9bwxqslnk/htEiOcaJMH8J
>>
>> The way to reproduce it is very easy:
>>
>> * bitbake gnutls -c cleansstate
>> * remove gnutls from download cache
>> * bitbake gnutls
>>
>> Adding gnutls back to download cache make the build succeed.
>>
>
> There is a stamp file in the download cache. If you don't clear that,
> then it will think it's still there.
>
> bitbake gnutls -c distclean
>
I think you mean cleanall!
I don't think we have distclean.
Sau!
> that should remove from the download cache, the stamp file, and all of
> the actions of cleansstate.
>
> --Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Possible bug in bitbake
2012-09-13 18:41 Possible bug in bitbake Otavio Salvador
2012-09-13 19:15 ` Mark Hatle
@ 2012-09-13 23:45 ` Paul Eggleton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-09-13 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Rogerio Pimentel, Daiane Angolini
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:41:15 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Rogerio and Daiane, here copied, found a bug in bitbake (we managed to
> reproduce it in denzil). The output in console when it happens can be
> seen at:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/meta-fsl-arm/7W9bwxqslnk/htEiOcaJMH8J
>
> The way to reproduce it is very easy:
>
> * bitbake gnutls -c cleansstate
> * remove gnutls from download cache
> * bitbake gnutls
Oh, hang on - now you mention gnutls, I think I know what it is. I suspect
if you apply either or both of these patches the issue will go away:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=0de1827a9601143b090f751ea702fdb65a936b77
http://cgit.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=57055d337a2c9997a6e5d5bdabaec396e3e128e9
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-13 23:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-13 18:41 Possible bug in bitbake Otavio Salvador
2012-09-13 19:15 ` Mark Hatle
2012-09-13 19:23 ` Saul Wold
2012-09-13 23:45 ` Paul Eggleton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox