Re: [RFC PATCH] license: Ensure we find multilib packages also

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 09/13/2012 03:31 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012 12:26:19 Saul Wold wrote:
>> Make sure to find -package, this was causing a failure
>> in the multi-lib build license generation during rootfs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/classes/license.bbclass |    2 +-
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/license.bbclass b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
>> index 29fe938..b29067c 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
>> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ license_create_manifest() {
>>   	# list of installed packages is broken for deb
>>   	for pkg in ${INSTALLED_PKGS}; do
>>   		# not the best way to do this but licenses are not arch dependant iirc
>> -		filename=`ls ${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/*/runtime-reverse/${pkg}| head -1`
>> +		filename=`ls ${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/*/runtime-reverse/*${pkg}| head -1`
>>   		pkged_pn="$(sed -n 's/^PN: //p' ${filename})"
>>
>>   		# exclude locale recipes
>
> Surely this could end up matching a the wrong file when one package name is a
> substring of another?
>
I am open to ideas here, I tried the ${MLPREFIX}, but it seems to be 
empty when rootfs runs, that did not help, I thought about adding the 
'-', but that would fail in the non-multilib case, how can I determine 
what the prefix will be to get a more accurate match?

Sau!

> Cheers,
> Paul
>