From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Opkg patch upstreaming and SIGSEGV fix
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:29:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505A010F.6080104@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1348074403.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
On 09/19/2012 10:16 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> This depends on
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/36893/
> otherwise warning about missing SRC_URI entries will be shown
>
> The following changes since commit f06097f4581e4c728c2950a86e025384e4bdcdf0:
>
> eglibc: Do not use fsqrt in libm when building for fsl ppc with fpu (2012-09-18 07:44:13 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib jansa/opkg
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/opkg
>
> Martin Jansa (3):
> opkg: replace local patches with git patches submitted upstream
> opkg: add patch to fix SIGSEGV when printing status file
> opkg-nogpg: drop SRCREV
>
> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-nogpg_svn.bb | 2 -
> .../0001-add-opkg_compare_versions-function.patch | 51 ++++++++++++++
> ...e-the-uname-gname-fields-when-extracting.patch} | 30 +++++---
> ...ix-dependency-issues-for-preinst-scripts.patch} | 65 ++++++++++--------
> ...nst-script-is-not-fatal-with-conf-offlin.patch} | 75 +++++++++++---------
> ...ot-read-etc-opkg-.conf-if-f-is-specified.patch} | 11 ++-
> ...tch => 0006-detect-circular-dependencies.patch} | 79 +++++++++++++---------
> ...g-provides-even-when-oldpkg-provides-exis.patch | 46 +++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch | 36 ----------
These patches do not have Upstream-Status in the local version, I guess
you are trying to preserve the original state? How soon will they be
accepted into the upstream?
They should still have Upstream-Status: Submitted added.
Thanks
Sau!
> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 15 ++--
> 10 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0001-add-opkg_compare_versions-function.patch
> rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{add_uname_support.patch => 0002-Ensure-we-use-the-uname-gname-fields-when-extracting.patch} (71%)
> rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{fix_installorder.patch => 0003-Fix-dependency-issues-for-preinst-scripts.patch} (82%)
> rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{offline_postinstall.patch => 0004-Failed-postinst-script-is-not-fatal-with-conf-offlin.patch} (52%)
> rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{conf_override.patch => 0005-Do-not-read-etc-opkg-.conf-if-f-is-specified.patch} (91%)
> rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/{track_parents.patch => 0006-detect-circular-dependencies.patch} (59%)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0007-merge-newpkg-provides-even-when-oldpkg-provides-exis.patch
> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 17:16 [PATCH 0/3] Opkg patch upstreaming and SIGSEGV fix Martin Jansa
2012-09-19 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] opkg: replace local patches with git patches submitted upstream Martin Jansa
2012-09-19 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] opkg: add patch to fix SIGSEGV when printing status file Martin Jansa
[not found] ` <cover.1348076271.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
2012-09-19 17:40 ` [PATCHv2 " Martin Jansa
2012-09-19 17:41 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] opkg: replace local patches with git patches submitted upstream Martin Jansa
2012-09-19 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] opkg-nogpg: drop SRCREV Martin Jansa
2012-09-19 17:29 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2012-09-19 17:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] Opkg patch upstreaming and SIGSEGV fix Martin Jansa
2012-09-21 22:25 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505A010F.6080104@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox