From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
To: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] populate_sdk_base.bbclass: check installation machine before installing SDK
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:51:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5097A842.9030302@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509770C2.8070202@windriver.com>
On 11/05/2012 09:54 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 11/05/2012 09:58 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/01/2012 09:23 PM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
>>> Do not allow installer to continue if the installation machine architecture
>>> does not match the intended SDK machine architecture.
>>>
>>> [YOCTO: #3269]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass
>>> b/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass
>>> index a3ac757..dc715c4 100644
>>> --- a/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass
>>> +++ b/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass
>>> @@ -118,6 +118,14 @@ fakeroot create_shar() {
>>> cat << "EOF" > ${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAIN_OUTPUTNAME}.sh
>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>
>>> +INST_ARCH=$(uname -m | sed -e "s/i[3-6]86/ix86/" -e "s/x86[-_]64/x86_64/")
>>> +SDKMACHINE=$(echo ${SDKMACHINE} | sed -e "s/i[5-6]86/ix86/")
>>> +
>>
>> I'm afraid this doesn't work, how does the script know the SDKMACHINE ?
>> The SDKMACHINE would always be null in
>> poky-eglibc-x86_64-i586-toolchain-gmae-1.3+snapshot-20121104.sh
>>
>
> This was because i didn't set the SDKMACHINE, I seldom set it when build
> the sdk, but it seems that we should set it since it needs
>
> include conf/machine-sdk/${SDKMACHINE}.conf
Hmm, I had it set in my local.conf... I missed the fact that, by
default, the local.conf had it commented out.
>
> Can we check whether the SDKMACHINE is null before build the SDK or use
> SDK_ARCH rather than the SDKMACHINE here ? Otherwise, if we don't set the
> SDKMACHINE, the SDK would be built, but it can't be installed, we would
> always get this error:
I suppose we can safely use SDK_ARCH here, instead of SDKMACHINE. I'll
prepare a patch asap.
>
> Error: Installation machine not supported!
>
> // Robert
>
>> // Robert
>>
>>
>>> +if [ "$INST_ARCH" != "$SDKMACHINE" ]; then
>>> + echo "Error: Installation machine not supported!"
>>> + exit -1
>>> +fi
>>> +
>>> DEFAULT_INSTALL_DIR="${SDKPATH}"
>>> COMPONENTS_LEN=$(echo ".${SDKPATH}" | sed "s/\// /g" | wc -w)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-05 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 13:23 [PATCH] populate_sdk_base.bbclass: check installation machine before installing SDK Laurentiu Palcu
2012-11-05 1:58 ` Robert Yang
2012-11-05 7:54 ` Robert Yang
2012-11-05 11:51 ` Laurentiu Palcu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5097A842.9030302@intel.com \
--to=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox