binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Khem Raj]

Hi

Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here

http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23

If you are using angstrom set

ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
for OE-Core it will work as it is

Let me know if you see any errors.

I will keep updating it until 2.23 release

Thanks
-Khem

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1122 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> 
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
> 
> If you are using angstrom set
> 
> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
> for OE-Core it will work as it is
> 
> Let me know if you see any errors.

I was trying to build armv4t image with gold enabled again to see if
those issues with gold are resolved and building linux-3.2 and linux-2.6.39 
are failing with this:

|   LD      arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
| arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o and output
| arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o and output
| make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1

Any hint for that?

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
>> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
>> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
>>
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
>>
>> If you are using angstrom set
>>
>> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
>> for OE-Core it will work as it is
>>
>> Let me know if you see any errors.
>
> I was trying to build armv4t image with gold enabled again to see if
> those issues with gold are resolved and building linux-3.2 and linux-2.6.39
> are failing with this:
>
> |   LD      arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o and output
> | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o and output
> | make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1
>
> Any hint for that?

probably you need something like below
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2011-January/003131.html

>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2258 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 07:53:43AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> >> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> >> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> >>
> >> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
> >>
> >> If you are using angstrom set
> >>
> >> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
> >> for OE-Core it will work as it is
> >>
> >> Let me know if you see any errors.
> >
> > I was trying to build armv4t image with gold enabled again to see if
> > those issues with gold are resolved and building linux-3.2 and linux-2.6.39
> > are failing with this:
> >
> > |   LD      arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> > | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o and output
> > | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o and output
> > | make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1
> >
> > Any hint for that?
> 
> probably you need something like below
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2011-January/003131.html

I've used something like
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_tuna/commit/ec1ac589d49081286164246fbaaba0012ae7ecac
and core-image-minimal-mtdutils looks better wrt gold issues we had, now
waiting for bigger image like shr-lite-image to test it more.

Cheers,

> 
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4659 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:57:32PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 07:53:43AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> > >> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> > >> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> > >>
> > >> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
> > >>
> > >> If you are using angstrom set
> > >>
> > >> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
> > >> for OE-Core it will work as it is
> > >>
> > >> Let me know if you see any errors.
> > >
> > > I was trying to build armv4t image with gold enabled again to see if
> > > those issues with gold are resolved and building linux-3.2 and linux-2.6.39
> > > are failing with this:
> > >
> > > |   LD      arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> > > | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o and output
> > > | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: error: DIV usage mismatch between arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o and output
> > > | make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1
> > >
> > > Any hint for that?
> > 
> > probably you need something like below
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2011-January/003131.html
> 
> I've used something like
> https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_tuna/commit/ec1ac589d49081286164246fbaaba0012ae7ecac
> and core-image-minimal-mtdutils looks better wrt gold issues we had, now
> waiting for bigger image like shr-lite-image to test it more.

As I said on IRC, I spoke too soon, bash and other apps still suffer from Illegal instrictions 
when gold is used on armv4t..

Also firefox does not build anymore (this is from armv7a): will try to disable-efl-hack later

| g++ -o elfhack -isystem/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include -O2 -pipe -fpermissive -L/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib -L/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/lib -Wl,-rpath,/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/lib -Wl,-O1 host_elf.o host_elfhack.o
| arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-g++  -march=armv7-a -fno-tree-vectorize     -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -mtune=cortex-a8 --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/nokia900 -fno-rtti -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-variadic-macros -Werror=return-type -Os -fsigned-char -fno-strict-aliasing -fpermissive -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu++0x -pthread -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -pipe -fexceptions  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -g -Os -freorder-blocks  -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--gc-sections -Wl,-h,test.so -o test.so -lpthread -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--icf=safe   -Wl,-rpath-link,/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/dist/bin -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/lib  test.o
| ===
| === If you get failures below, please file a bug describing the error
| === and your environment (compiler and linker versions), and use
| === --disable-elf-hack until this is fixed.
| ===
| /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack/elfhack -b test.so
| test.so: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
|   what():  Unsupported relocation type
| make[7]: *** [test.so] Aborted (core dumped)
| make[7]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack'



-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Khem Raj]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> | === If you get failures below, please file a bug describing the error
> | === and your environment (compiler and linker versions), and use
> | === --disable-elf-hack until this is fixed.
> | ===
> | /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack/elfhack -b test.so
> | test.so: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
> |   what():  Unsupported relocation type
> | make[7]: *** [test.so] Aborted (core dumped)
> | make[7]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack'

it might be you are seeing same bug in elfhack as described here

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632920

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1374 bytes --]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:30:25PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > | === If you get failures below, please file a bug describing the error
> > | === and your environment (compiler and linker versions), and use
> > | === --disable-elf-hack until this is fixed.
> > | ===
> > | /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack/elfhack -b test.so
> > | test.so: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
> > |   what():  Unsupported relocation type
> > | make[7]: *** [test.so] Aborted (core dumped)
> > | make[7]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack'
> 
> it might be you are seeing same bug in elfhack as described here
> 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632920

I've disabled elf hack yesterday
https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-browser/commit/5d176cb405497e5c5823fa14dbae353a2e1e3730
and it did build fine with 2.22 as well as 23, but GNUtoo then reported that 
it still produces Illegal instructions.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1877 bytes --]

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:14:25AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:30:25PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > | === If you get failures below, please file a bug describing the error
> > > | === and your environment (compiler and linker versions), and use
> > > | === --disable-elf-hack until this is fixed.
> > > | ===
> > > | /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack/elfhack -b test.so
> > > | test.so: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
> > > |   what():  Unsupported relocation type
> > > | make[7]: *** [test.so] Aborted (core dumped)
> > > | make[7]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/shr-core-branches/workspace/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/firefox-10.0.2-r2/mozilla-release/build/unix/elfhack'
> > 
> > it might be you are seeing same bug in elfhack as described here
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632920
> 
> I've disabled elf hack yesterday
> https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-browser/commit/5d176cb405497e5c5823fa14dbae353a2e1e3730
> and it did build fine with 2.22 as well as 23, but GNUtoo then reported that 
> it still produces Illegal instructions.

Another issue I've noticed today is gtk-update-icon-cache failing on
armv4t with
Illegal instruction (even without gold enabled). Not 100% sure it's
because of switch from binutils-2.22 to 2.23, but it still works in my
other builddirs (without binutils-2.23). Will debug this a bit more when
I find some time.

SHR root@gjama ~ $ gtk-update-icon-cache -q /usr/share/icons/shr/
Illegal instruction

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1402 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> 
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23

After last rebase of this branch, upgrade from 2.22.92* (or something
like that) to git with SRCREV d56d3537a00d85d9072156026f426c931ba21fba

I see errors like this
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2012-09/msg00036.html
when building 2.6.39 kernel for armv4t
| arch/arm/lib/copy_template.S: Assembler messages:
| arch/arm/lib/copy_template.S:100: Error: selected processor does not
support ARM mode `ldralt r3,[r1],#4'

Is it binutils bug or something needs to be changed in kernel again?

Cheers,

> 
> If you are using angstrom set
> 
> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
> for OE-Core it will work as it is
> 
> Let me know if you see any errors.
> 
> I will keep updating it until 2.23 release
> 
> Thanks
> -Khem
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Khem Raj]

On (16/09/12 08:06), Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> > components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> > for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> > 
> > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
> 
> After last rebase of this branch, upgrade from 2.22.92* (or something
> like that) to git with SRCREV d56d3537a00d85d9072156026f426c931ba21fba
> 
> I see errors like this
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2012-09/msg00036.html
> when building 2.6.39 kernel for armv4t
> | arch/arm/lib/copy_template.S: Assembler messages:
> | arch/arm/lib/copy_template.S:100: Error: selected processor does not
> support ARM mode `ldralt r3,[r1],#4'
> 
> Is it binutils bug or something needs to be changed in kernel again?

This is a binutils bug
see discussions on
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00128.html

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> > 
> > If you are using angstrom set
> > 
> > ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
> > for OE-Core it will work as it is
> > 
> > Let me know if you see any errors.
> > 
> > I will keep updating it until 2.23 release
> > 
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 
> -- 
> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com



> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


-- 
-Khem

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 731 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> 
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
> 
> If you are using angstrom set
> 
> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
> for OE-Core it will work as it is
> 
> Let me know if you see any errors.
> 
> I will keep updating it until 2.23 release

Now with danny released, can this be merged? Maybe updated to 2.23.1 too.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Saul Wold]

On 11/16/2012 12:07 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
>> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
>> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
>>
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
>>
>> If you are using angstrom set
>>
>> ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION = "2.23" in local.conf after pulling that branch
>> for OE-Core it will work as it is
>>
>> Let me know if you see any errors.
>>
>> I will keep updating it until 2.23 release
>
> Now with danny released, can this be merged? Maybe updated to 2.23.1 too.
>
Apparently there is an issue with the SDK that is being worked on, once 
that issue is resolved we will look into merging the updated version of 
binutils.

Sau!

> Cheers,
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Enrico Scholz]

Khem Raj <raj.khem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23
>
> Let me know if you see any errors.

in meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.23.bb:

| +EXTRA_OECONF_virtclass-native = "--enable-target=all --enable-64-bit-bfd --enable-install-libbfd"

'--enable-target=all' is invalid; there does not exist such an option.
This should be '--enable-targets=all'.


Enrico

Re: binutils 2.23 call for testing the recipes

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

W dniu 08.08.2012 19:45, Khem Raj pisze:
> Hi
> 
> Binutils 2.23 branch has started upstream. Given that toolchain
> components require a lot of soak time, I have created the recipes
> for binutils 2.23 and pushed it here
> 
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23

AArch64 builds boot fine.