Re: [PATCH] libcgroup: fix the QA issue for pam_cgroup.so*

[Pascal Ouyang <xin.ouyang@windriver.com>]

于 2013年01月23日 20:00, Burton, Ross 写道:
> On 23 January 2013 02:31, Xin Ouyang <Xin.Ouyang@windriver.com> wrote:
>> pam modules in ${base_libdir}/security/ should be binary .so files,
>> not symlinks. So fix this QA issue.
>
> The short log should explain the problem more than just "fix QA issue".
>
> The commit log also doesn't say anything about moving libcgroup from
> /usr/lib to /lib.  Also isn't just setting --libdir in EXTRA_OEMAKE
> cleaner?


You know pam_cgroup.so is installed into ${base_libdir}/security, this 
will cause "unsafe-references-in-binaries" QA issue if libcgroup.so.0 is 
installed into ${libdir}.

I will add this reason in V2.

I do not use --libdir because pkgconfig/dev-so files should always 
installed into ${libdir} instead of ${base_libdir}.

>
> Finally, no PR bumps are needed in oe-core.

Why no PR bumps needed?

Thanks. :)

- Pascal

>
> Ross
>
>


-- 
- Pascal