From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH dylan, master] Fix meta-toolchain-qte SDK build for x11-less DISTRO
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:19:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AF7336.8050802@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKrxMh3PGGwVHdVFcUL2-Ag4vA2bAKr+3PGKGNDzwMJnpg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/05/2013 10:12 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com
> <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2013 09:32 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com
> <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>
> <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>>> wrote:
>
> You could just directly put the nativesdk-libx11 in place
> of the
> variable, no need to have the variable there.
>
>
> yes, that's what I had initially, but found it was less easy to
> read...
> with X11DEPENDS it's more 'obvious' that there is something
> special..
> that said, i can make the change if that's really needed.
>
> We do use the X11DEPENDS elsewhere when there are multiple
> dependencies, but I also found cases where we just include the
> dependency directly in the test. I was trying pick a direction:
> single entry no X11DEPENDS, multiple entries use X11DEPENDS.
>
> Comments, flames, ...
>
>
> Yes; I sent this patch in Febuary:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/44759/
>
> Please use this one instead of the recent one.
>
Well reading back on that, it looks like I was waiting for an
EXTRA_OECONF or related change to the autoconf scripts.
Sau!
> --
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 7:24 [PATCH dylan, master] Fix meta-toolchain-qte SDK build for x11-less DISTRO Nicolas Dechesne
2013-06-05 16:30 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-05 16:32 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2013-06-05 16:58 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-05 17:12 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-06-05 17:19 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2013-06-05 17:23 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2013-06-05 17:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-06-05 20:07 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-06-05 20:10 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-06-05 20:53 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-05 20:56 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-06-05 20:58 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-06-06 15:46 ` Richard Purdie
2013-06-06 16:28 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-06-07 12:19 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2013-06-05 16:40 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AF7336.8050802@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox