Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] grep-2.5.1a: fix grep for LSB compliance
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:16:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521D95B8.1040601@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521C4CBD.3070506@linux.intel.com>

at 2013-8-27 14:52, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 09:32 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> ...skip... at 2013-8-27 9:00, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.5.1a.bb
>>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.5.1a.bb index
>>>> 088959c..d964d84 100644 ---
>>>> a/meta/recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.5.1a.bb +++
>>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.5.1a.bb @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>>>> SECTION = "console/utils" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>>>> "file://COPYING;md5=0636e73ff0215e8d672dc4c32c317bb3"
>>>>
>>>> -PR = "r2" +PR = "r3"
>>>>
>>>> SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/grep/grep-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
>>>> file://uclibc-fix.patch \ @@ -13,8 +13,25 @@ SRC_URI =
>>>> "${GNU_MIRROR}/grep/grep-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ file://gettext.patch \
>>>> file://fix64-int-to-pointer.patch \ file://Makevars \ -
>>>> file://grep-CVE-2012-5667.patch \
>>>
>>> Why are you removing this patch?
>>>
>>> Will an update to 2.5.3 accomplish the same thing as these
>>> patches?
>>>
>>> Also all of your patches above are missing Upstream-Status and
>>> Signed-off-by:
>>>
>>> See the Patch Guildlines on OE-Core:
>>> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sau!
>>>
>>>
>> ...skip...
>>>> + file://grep-CVE-2012-5667.patch \
>> ...skip...
>>
>> Thank a lots for your comments.
>>
>> This patch is not removed ,it is here ↑
>>
>> I don't know what's fixed bettwen 2.5.1a an 2.5.3, but grep-2.5.3
>> LICENSE is GPLv3+ differed from 2.5.1a(GPLv2)
>>
>> The Guildlines is very helpful for me. But those patch is come from
>> grep-2.5.1-55.el5.src.rpm and I have not research this patch's
>> Upstream-Status and Signed-off-by So I am sorry about that
>>
>
> Please review the recipes and licenesing, since it seems the we might
> have multiple versions and the license fields are incorrect for both.
>
> If there are both v2 and v3 versions, we need to ensure which is correct.

As I known,
grep-2.5.1: GPL
grep-2.5.1a: GPLv2
grep-2.5.3 or later: GPLv3

I think both of them(2.5.1a and 2.14) are in the correct license right now.

Thanks
  Li

>
> Thanks
>     Sau!
>
>> Thanks Li,
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Best regards.
Li Zhijian (8555)




  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-28  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-27  9:43 [PATCH] grep-2.5.1a: fix grep for LSB compliance Li Zhijian
2013-08-27  1:00 ` Saul Wold
2013-08-27  4:32   ` Li Zhijian
2013-08-27  6:52     ` Saul Wold
2013-08-28  6:16       ` Li Zhijian [this message]
2013-08-27 10:43   ` Phil Blundell
2013-08-28  5:47     ` Li Zhijian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521D95B8.1040601@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox