* [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ?
@ 2013-08-29 1:46 Li Zhijian
2013-08-29 6:52 ` Robert Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhijian @ 2013-08-29 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core, Yocto list discussion
Hi,
I had build libxml and executed xmlcatalog
It shows follow messages
# xmlcatalog --help
libxml was not compiled with catalog and output support
meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc: 32
EXTRA_OECONF = "--without-python --without-debug --without-legacy --without-catalog --without-docbook --with-c14n --without-lzma --with-fexceptions"
Is it reasonable to add --without-catalog EXTRA_OECONF ?
Thanks
Best regards.
Li Zhijian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ?
2013-08-29 1:46 [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ? Li Zhijian
@ 2013-08-29 6:52 ` Robert Yang
2013-08-30 5:55 ` Li Zhijian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2013-08-29 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zhijian; +Cc: Yocto list discussion, openembedded-core
I took a look at the libxml's git log, didn't see the explicit reason
that why use the --without-catalog, so it seems reasonable to use the
--with-catalog which will make the xmlcatalog work (if it can be built
well with the option.)
// Robert
On 08/29/2013 09:46 AM, Li Zhijian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had build libxml and executed xmlcatalog
> It shows follow messages
> # xmlcatalog --help
> libxml was not compiled with catalog and output support
>
> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc: 32
> EXTRA_OECONF = "--without-python --without-debug --without-legacy --without-catalog --without-docbook --with-c14n --without-lzma --with-fexceptions"
>
> Is it reasonable to add --without-catalog EXTRA_OECONF ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Best regards.
> Li Zhijian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ?
2013-08-29 6:52 ` Robert Yang
@ 2013-08-30 5:55 ` Li Zhijian
2013-08-30 8:16 ` Robert Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhijian @ 2013-08-30 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Yang; +Cc: openembedded-core
libxml2 is built successfully with option of --with-catalog,and xmlcatalog
work well
Maybe I would send a patch to fix it.
Thanks
Li
at 2013-8-29 14:52, Robert Yang wrote:
>
> I took a look at the libxml's git log, didn't see the explicit reason
> that why use the --without-catalog, so it seems reasonable to use the
> --with-catalog which will make the xmlcatalog work (if it can be built
> well with the option.)
>
> // Robert
>
> On 08/29/2013 09:46 AM, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had build libxml and executed xmlcatalog
>> It shows follow messages
>> # xmlcatalog --help
>> libxml was not compiled with catalog and output support
>>
>> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc: 32
>> EXTRA_OECONF = "--without-python --without-debug --without-legacy --without-catalog --without-docbook --with-c14n --without-lzma --with-fexceptions"
>>
>> Is it reasonable to add --without-catalog EXTRA_OECONF ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Best regards.
>> Li Zhijian
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>
>
--
Best regards.
Li Zhijian (8555)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ?
2013-08-30 5:55 ` Li Zhijian
@ 2013-08-30 8:16 ` Robert Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2013-08-30 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zhijian; +Cc: openembedded-core
On 08/30/2013 01:55 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
> libxml2 is built successfully with option of --with-catalog,and xmlcatalog
> work well
>
> Maybe I would send a patch to fix it.
>
Yes, that would be great, thanks.
// Robert
> Thanks
> Li
>
> at 2013-8-29 14:52, Robert Yang wrote:
>>
>> I took a look at the libxml's git log, didn't see the explicit reason
>> that why use the --without-catalog, so it seems reasonable to use the
>> --with-catalog which will make the xmlcatalog work (if it can be built
>> well with the option.)
>>
>> // Robert
>>
>> On 08/29/2013 09:46 AM, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had build libxml and executed xmlcatalog
>>> It shows follow messages
>>> # xmlcatalog --help
>>> libxml was not compiled with catalog and output support
>>>
>>> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc: 32
>>> EXTRA_OECONF = "--without-python --without-debug --without-legacy
>>> --without-catalog --without-docbook --with-c14n --without-lzma
>>> --with-fexceptions"
>>>
>>> Is it reasonable to add --without-catalog EXTRA_OECONF ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>> Li Zhijian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-30 8:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-29 1:46 [Question] libxml: How about add --with-catalog to EXTRA_OECONF ? Li Zhijian
2013-08-29 6:52 ` Robert Yang
2013-08-30 5:55 ` Li Zhijian
2013-08-30 8:16 ` Robert Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox