Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core-image-basic.bb: Allow user extensions
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:40:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52712859.6070002@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1953485.uklNZh2O8P@helios>

On 2013-10-30 09:33, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 October 2013 08:55:09 Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On 2013-10-30 08:47, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 30 October 2013 08:22:35 Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>> Allow the user to provide additional packages to this image.
>>>> This lets core-image-basic behave like all other core-image*
>>>> recipes (which do support CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL), as well
>>>> as match the documentation which suggests this as the mode to
>>>> extend any core-image* image.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>     meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb |    3 +++
>>>>     1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
>>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb index 091f57d..e393a28
>>>> 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
>>>> @@ -3,9 +3,12 @@ functionality installed."
>>>>
>>>>      IMAGE_FEATURES += "splash ssh-server-openssh"
>>>>
>>>>     +CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL ?= ""
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Not sure if it's my mail client but the above looks slightly mangled; in
>>> any case the above addition shouldn't be needed because
>>> core-image.bbclass already does this.
>>
>> Are you sure it counts?  core-image.bbclass is included after this would be
>> evaluated, or does that not matter?
>
> It doesn't matter in most cases, because the value won't actually be expanded
> until later. Values aren't expanded unless you use immediate expansion (the :=
> operator) or you d.getVar("SOMEVAR", True) is called from python code to
> return the expanded value.

Understood, thanks.

Should I send another patch with that line removed?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-30 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-30 14:22 [PATCH] core-image-basic.bb: Allow user extensions Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 14:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-10-30 14:55   ` Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 15:33     ` Paul Eggleton
2013-10-30 15:40       ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2013-10-30 15:42         ` Paul Eggleton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52712859.6070002@mlbassoc.com \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox