From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core-image-basic.bb: Allow user extensions
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:40:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52712859.6070002@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1953485.uklNZh2O8P@helios>
On 2013-10-30 09:33, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 October 2013 08:55:09 Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On 2013-10-30 08:47, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 30 October 2013 08:22:35 Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>> Allow the user to provide additional packages to this image.
>>>> This lets core-image-basic behave like all other core-image*
>>>> recipes (which do support CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL), as well
>>>> as match the documentation which suggests this as the mode to
>>>> extend any core-image* image.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
>>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb index 091f57d..e393a28
>>>> 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
>>>> @@ -3,9 +3,12 @@ functionality installed."
>>>>
>>>> IMAGE_FEATURES += "splash ssh-server-openssh"
>>>>
>>>> +CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL ?= ""
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Not sure if it's my mail client but the above looks slightly mangled; in
>>> any case the above addition shouldn't be needed because
>>> core-image.bbclass already does this.
>>
>> Are you sure it counts? core-image.bbclass is included after this would be
>> evaluated, or does that not matter?
>
> It doesn't matter in most cases, because the value won't actually be expanded
> until later. Values aren't expanded unless you use immediate expansion (the :=
> operator) or you d.getVar("SOMEVAR", True) is called from python code to
> return the expanded value.
Understood, thanks.
Should I send another patch with that line removed?
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-30 14:22 [PATCH] core-image-basic.bb: Allow user extensions Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 14:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-10-30 14:55 ` Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 15:33 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-10-30 15:40 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2013-10-30 15:42 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52712859.6070002@mlbassoc.com \
--to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox