Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] V2 lz4: update to latest version

[akuster <akuster@mvista.com>]

Did not mean to generate extra work for you all.

Thanks for the input. I will go back to the drawing board.

regards,
Armin
On 07/16/2014 06:48 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 10:11, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> I'm still a little concerned about this change from svn to git. Which is
>> the definitive source? It looks like the svn repo is active too?
>>
>> I just don't want to end up in a position where we're pulling from
>> someone's hack'n'dev version of lz4 rather than the place considered the
>> real "master" source...
> The revision histories *are* different (commits marked "untested" and
> then fixed in another commit) but the owner of the git repo is the
> same as the owner of the svn repo.  It looks like git is his working
> area and then changes that have been tested are merged and committed
> to git.
>
> Unless there's a good reason I'd keep with the svn repo for now.
>
> Ross