Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* util-linux hwclock ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY set to 10 for meta-nslu2 -- still needed?
@ 2014-07-23 17:13 Ben Shelton
  2014-07-23 17:37 ` Saul Wold
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Shelton @ 2014-07-23 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

Hi all,

In meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc, there exists the
following:

# There seems to be problem, atleast on nslu2, with these, untill they are
# fixed the busybox ones have higher priority
ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY[hwclock] = "10"

Is this still necessary?  Right now, we're carrying a commit in our
local repo to change this to ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY[hwclock] ?= "100" so
we can use the util-linux version of hwclock rather than the busybox one
(as Saul had proposed at one point, so meta-nslu2 could override it).

Thanks,
Ben


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-23 17:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-23 17:13 util-linux hwclock ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY set to 10 for meta-nslu2 -- still needed? Ben Shelton
2014-07-23 17:37 ` Saul Wold

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox