* qemuppc64
@ 2014-09-30 17:14 akuster808
2014-09-30 17:55 ` qemuppc64 Mark Hatle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: akuster808 @ 2014-09-30 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OE-core, Bruce Ashfield, Richard Purdie
Hello,
With 1.7 in the midst of being finalized, when would be a good time for
me to continue perusing getting qemuppc64 accepted to master-next?
regards,
Armin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: qemuppc64
2014-09-30 17:14 qemuppc64 akuster808
@ 2014-09-30 17:55 ` Mark Hatle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hatle @ 2014-09-30 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 9/30/14, 12:14 PM, akuster808 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With 1.7 in the midst of being finalized, when would be a good time for
> me to continue perusing getting qemuppc64 accepted to master-next?
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
I'd suggest do like the aarch64 stuff.. put the qemuppc64 into a custom branch
(along with any other changes you might need).. keep it rebased.. and lets try
to get it in once this iteration is complete.. (hopefully right away in the next).
--Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-30 17:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-30 17:14 qemuppc64 akuster808
2014-09-30 17:55 ` qemuppc64 Mark Hatle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox