Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* preferred remotes for git pulls?
@ 2014-10-31 10:05 Peter A. Bigot
  2014-10-31 10:11 ` Paul Eggleton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter A. Bigot @ 2014-10-31 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OE-core

There are two changes (virtual/bluez and pseudo-no-host-passwd) that I'd 
like to rework and propose for master now that it's reopened.  Both are 
likely to touch multiple files.  Previous comments and the wiki how-to 
suggest that git-pull is preferred over patchwork-only for multi-patch 
changes like this.

I have existing github resources that I could use as the source. Would 
that be acceptable to the maintainers?

If using an openembedded-hosted -contrib repository is preferred, what's 
the process for getting access?  I'd be touching openembedded-core and 
meta-openembedded at the least.

Peter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: preferred remotes for git pulls?
  2014-10-31 10:05 preferred remotes for git pulls? Peter A. Bigot
@ 2014-10-31 10:11 ` Paul Eggleton
  2014-10-31 10:18   ` Burton, Ross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2014-10-31 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter A. Bigot; +Cc: openembedded-core

Hi Peter,

On Friday 31 October 2014 05:05:37 Peter A. Bigot wrote:
> There are two changes (virtual/bluez and pseudo-no-host-passwd) that I'd
> like to rework and propose for master now that it's reopened.  Both are
> likely to touch multiple files.  Previous comments and the wiki how-to
> suggest that git-pull is preferred over patchwork-only for multi-patch
> changes like this.
> 
> I have existing github resources that I could use as the source. Would
> that be acceptable to the maintainers?

I think for OE-Core at least the contrib repo is preferred but not necessarily 
mandatory.
 
> If using an openembedded-hosted -contrib repository is preferred, what's
> the process for getting access?  I'd be touching openembedded-core and
> meta-openembedded at the least.

Getting push access to the contrib repos is pretty easy - just email Michael 
Halstead <michael@yoctoproject.org> asking for access specifying the 
repositories, specify your desired prefix for contrib branches (e.g. mine is 
paule/), and attach your SSH pubkey if you haven't already sent it previously.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: preferred remotes for git pulls?
  2014-10-31 10:11 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2014-10-31 10:18   ` Burton, Ross
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2014-10-31 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter A. Bigot; +Cc: OE-core

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 484 bytes --]

On 31 October 2014 10:11, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
wrote:

> > I have existing github resources that I could use as the source. Would
> > that be acceptable to the maintainers?
>
> I think for OE-Core at least the contrib repo is preferred but not
> necessarily
> mandatory.


poky-contrib or openembedded-core-contrib is preferred as they're already
in various people's remotes configuration, but any git repo is preferable
to no git repo!

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 875 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-31 10:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-31 10:05 preferred remotes for git pulls? Peter A. Bigot
2014-10-31 10:11 ` Paul Eggleton
2014-10-31 10:18   ` Burton, Ross

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox