Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix builds for MIPS64 N32

[Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>]

On 7/21/15 3:23 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 2015-07-20 18:47 GMT+03:00 Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>:
>> Between customer escalations, other work and vacation.. I didn't happen.
> 
> No problem, really. I just wanted to be sure that the patches aren't going
> to be lost.
> 
>>
>> I've started testing it this morning and should have results tomorrow.. (US time).
> 
> Thank you very much!

With master and the four patches I got an error trying to construct the SDK.

I'm still investigating the error:

Collected errors:
 * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for
packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64:
 *      gcc-cross-canadian-mips *       binutils-cross-canadian-mips *
gdb-cross-canadian-mips *
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64.


My configuration for this particular test was:

(oe-init-build-env stock w/ the following changes)

MACHINE = "qemumips64"

require conf/multilib.conf
DEFAULTTUNE = "mips64-n32"
MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib64 multilib:lib32"
DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib64 = "mips64"
DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "mips32r2"

# Set RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH to configure preferred ABI when using rpm packaging
# backend to generate a rootfs, choices are:
# 1: ELF32 wins
# 2: ELF64 wins
# 4: ELF64 N32 wins (for mips64 or mips64el only)
RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH = "4"


>>
>> --Mark
>>
>> On 7/20/15 7:11 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> 2015-07-08 15:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>:
>>>> On 7/8/15 7:00 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-07-01 17:02 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Quite simple configuration (MIPS64 N32 image) fails to build (see below).
>>>>>> I have verified these patches in both single lib and in multilib cases.
>>>>>> Tri-lib images and SDK for MIPS build fine with these patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comments on this patchset? It would be nice to have N32 ubroken in
>>>>> the current
>>>>> master tree.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I'm traveling right now and haven't had time to review this.  I should be
>>>> able to get back to the office and test it by the end of the week.
>>>>
>>>> I visually reviewed the patches and I don't object to them going in -- but I'm
>>>> still not sure they are all correct.
>>>
>>> Re-ping. I'd like to receive a confirmation from you (and thus get the
>>> patches merged)
>>> or to discuss, what seems wrong to you.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Mark
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Current situation:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lumag@nexs:~/OE$ MACHINE=qemumips64n32 bitbake core-image-base
>>>>>> NOTE: Started PRServer with DBfile:
>>>>>> /home/lumag/OE/cache/prserv.sqlite3, IP: 127.0.0.1, PORT: 46391, PID:
>>>>>> 15895
>>>>>> Loading cache: 100%
>>>>>> |########################################################################################################################|
>>>>>> ETA:  00:00:00
>>>>>> Loaded 1302 entries from dependency cache.
>>>>>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
>>>>>> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64' (but
>>>>>> /home/lumag/OE/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-cross-canadian.bb
>>>>>> RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
>>>>>> NOTE: Runtime target 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64' is unbuildable,
>>>>>> removing...
>>>>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['binutils-cross-canadian-mips64']
>>>>>> NOTE: Runtime target 'packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32' is
>>>>>> unbuildable, removing...
>>>>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was:
>>>>>> ['packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32',
>>>>>> 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64']
>>>>>> ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-base' has no buildable providers.
>>>>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-base',
>>>>>> 'packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32',
>>>>>> 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64']
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>