Re: [PATCH][master][fido][dizzy] Revert "perf: fix for rebuilding"

[Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>]

Hi Martin,

Sorry, I'm blocked by mutitlib SDK issues recently, I will fix it sooner.
Revert the patch is fine to me if it is urgent.

// Robert

On 09/15/2015 01:29 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * This reverts commit 9dafa571ed0a40d21a886dec7704c31150b21942.
>
> * The "fix" is causing more issues then it's fixing and there was no
>    feedback in many months.
> * More info:
>    http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-June/105684.html
>    http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-September/109870.html
>    http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-September/110338.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
> ---
>   meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> index adb3a2c..f1d7894 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> @@ -118,10 +118,6 @@ do_install() {
>   }
>
>   do_configure_prepend () {
> -    # Fix for rebuilding
> -    rm -rf ${B}/
> -    mkdir ${B}/
> -
>       # If building a multlib based perf, the incorrect library path will be
>       # detected by perf, since it triggers via: ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64). In a 32 bit
>       # build, with a 64 bit multilib, the arch won't match and the detection of a
>