* qemuarm update
@ 2015-12-20 0:30 Trevor Woerner
2015-12-20 17:09 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Woerner @ 2015-12-20 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OE-core
Would it make sense, would it be possible, for the qemuarm machine to
emulate ARMv7a instead of ARMv5?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: qemuarm update
2015-12-20 0:30 qemuarm update Trevor Woerner
@ 2015-12-20 17:09 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2015-12-20 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trevor Woerner, OE-core
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 19:30 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Would it make sense, would it be possible, for the qemuarm machine to
> emulate ARMv7a instead of ARMv5?
It certainly is possible, I think there are even some "qemuarmv7"
machine files out there which do this.
The main reason we've stuck with qemuarm being v5 was to help the
testing matrix since armv7 gets good coverage on real hardware, if we
stop building v5 with qemuarm, I suspect it will bitrot...
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-20 17:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-20 0:30 qemuarm update Trevor Woerner
2015-12-20 17:09 ` Richard Purdie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox