Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
To: akuster <akuster@mvista.com>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] Attention all: patches for upstream source will be applied with stricter criteria for context
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:13:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <639c3221-23ec-a73c-e333-24ef3ddead81@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62045b91-79db-cc5e-c372-70041b7fcdaa@mvista.com>

On 10/21/2016 06:08 PM, akuster wrote:
>> while updating gnutls to a newer version I came across a rather
>> serious issue: the way we patch source code is very lenient about the
>> context for the lines to be changed. Basically, it's enough for one
>> line before and after the changed line to match, because patch
>> command's default setting for 'fuzz factor' allows it. If these lines
>> happen to be whitespace or braces, then there's nothing to prevent the
>> patch from being applied incorrectly.
>>
>> Here's a particularly nasty example of this happening completely
>> silently (compile step works fine too), with security implications:
>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
>>
>> I think this absolutely needs to be fixed.
>
> Is there a target milestone for this change?

Currently the plan is to fix all of oe-core and send out a patchset, 
including the stricter fuzz setting in time for 2.3 M1. Here's the branch:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=akanavin/fix-patch-fuzz

>> The downside is that this will break a lot of patches across all
>> layers - after setting the fuzz to zero in oe-core we have 87 recipes
>> that fail to be patched. Maxin and I are currently going through them
>> one by one and getting them fixed.
>
> Is this going to impact the 2.2 release?

If we find any patches that are applied incorrectly (as opposed to just 
having out of date context but still applied correctly), then the fixes 
will be backported as well.

Alex



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-21 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-21 12:55 Attention all: patches for upstream source will be applied with stricter criteria for context Alexander Kanavin
     [not found] ` <62045b91-79db-cc5e-c372-70041b7fcdaa@mvista.com>
2016-10-21 15:13   ` Alexander Kanavin [this message]
2016-10-21 17:05 ` [yocto] " Khem Raj
2016-10-24 11:30   ` Alexander Kanavin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=639c3221-23ec-a73c-e333-24ef3ddead81@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akuster@mvista.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox