public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are built
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:42:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77e11e27-ec62-4a4d-2ca0-f874d9d09883@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1so-ifGj68AZj6WxFeFRrmDZMq9KcvpQsXYzdi_N5W89-A@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/23/2017 10:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Bruce Ashfield
> <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 08/22/2017 11:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield
>>> <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
>>>> BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
>>>> matched.
>>>>
>>>> This meant that someone looking for "qemux86foo" (which is an
>>>> invalid definition) would potentially end up building "qemuarm"
>>>> and be none the wiser (until it didn't boot).
>>>>
>>>> With this fix to the tools search routine, and improved return
>>>> code testing, we will now stop the build and report and error to
>>>> the user.
>>>>
>>>> [YOCTO: #11878]
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass                       | 3 +++
>>>>    meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb | 2 +-
>>>>    2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
>>>> b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
>>>> index 1ca0756c4959..3c6df92131bc 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
>>>> @@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ do_kernel_metadata() {
>>>>
>>>>           # expand kernel features into their full path equivalents
>>>>           bsp_definition=$(spp ${includes} --find -DKMACHINE=${KMACHINE}
>>>> -DKTYPE=${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE})
>>>> +       if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ -z "${bsp_definition}" ]; then
>>>> +               bbfatal_log "Could not locate BSP definiton for
>>>> ${KMACHINE}/${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE}."
>>>> +       fi
>>>
>>>
>>> this breaks non linux-yocto kernels which are using the kernel infra
>>> from OE-Core
>>> since they may not have kmeta structure and bsp_definition may be empty
>>> for them
>>> so either provide a way to override bsp_definition to something dummy or
>>> infact
>>> fall back to dummy by default with a warning or note during parse
>>> time. fatal is a bit harsh here.
>>
>>
>> Fair enough. I can make it a warning versus fatal, or only make it
>> fatal if I detect a defconfig.
>>
>> The issue is that the tools haven't found a configuration entry point
>> and could end up building a garbage/invalid configuration. A defconfig
>> could stand in as a 'valid entry' point, since it signifies a baseline
>> configuration.
>>
>> Also, I do have completed code to move fragment merging into a common
>> location and avoid things like this .. once it goes through some more
>> compatibility testing, I'll post it to the list.
> 
> 
> Irrespective this was merged today into master, can you send a followup
> quickly so we can unbreak meta-raspberrypi

I hadn't pulled today, and yes, I'll send something by end of day, since
I don't want this to stay broken!

Cheers,

Bruce

> 
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>           meta_dir=$(kgit --meta)
>>>>
>>>>           # run1: pull all the configuration fragments, no matter where
>>>> they come from
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
>>>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
>>>> index 2217a31076a2..4a78b897d34f 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
>>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>>>> "file://git/tools/kgit;beginline=5;endline=9;md5=a6c2fa8aef1b
>>>>
>>>>    DEPENDS = "git-native"
>>>>
>>>> -SRCREV = "9cd2b626d652bec10c6bc75275b35bfee74d447c"
>>>> +SRCREV = "0571411cc033c11df7827508dd786876ce2f8c83"
>>>>    PR = "r12"
>>>>    PV = "0.2+git${SRCPV}"
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.5.0
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>



  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21  2:58 [PATCH 0/9] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] kernel-yocto: configuration updates: x86 features Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] linux-yocto/4.1: fix fsl-ls10xx sdhci Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] linux-yocto: add usb-net configs by default Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] linux-yocto: introduce 4.12 recipes Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] linux-yocto: remove 4.1 recipes Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] libc-headers: update to 4.12 Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] qemu: bump default version " Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are built Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:00   ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2017-08-21 15:03     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:13       ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:16         ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2017-08-21 15:18           ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23  3:40   ` Khem Raj
2017-08-23 12:37     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23 14:40       ` Khem Raj
2017-08-23 14:42         ` Bruce Ashfield [this message]
2017-08-23 14:58           ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-23 15:00             ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23 15:07             ` Khem Raj
2017-08-23 18:31   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2017-08-23 18:56     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] linux-yocto/4.10: CVE & misc fixes Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  3:05 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request Patchwork
2017-08-21 11:42 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Richard Purdie
2017-08-21 12:11   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 13:01     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:55 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-21 15:57   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 16:12   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 14:24     ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 14:54       ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 15:28         ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 15:34           ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 16:00             ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 16:04               ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 16:07                 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 16:20                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 17:13                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 20:34                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 21:56                     ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77e11e27-ec62-4a4d-2ca0-f874d9d09883@windriver.com \
    --to=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox