public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>,
	"richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org"
	<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are	built
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:00:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b68f37bbad5940a8bdb7f165a7600f18@XBOX02.axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab92e7d90c416d6e5cdb17cdba269e09ec967607.1503283308.git.bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Bruce Ashfield
> Sent: den 21 augusti 2017 04:58
> To: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid
> BSPs are built
> 
> There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
> BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
> matched.
> 
> This meant that someone looking for "qemux86foo" (which is an
> invalid definition) would potentially end up building "qemuarm"
> and be none the wiser (until it didn't boot).
> 
> With this fix to the tools search routine, and improved return
> code testing, we will now stop the build and report and error to
> the user.
> 
> [YOCTO: #11878]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass                       | 3 +++
>  meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
> index 1ca0756c4959..3c6df92131bc 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass
> @@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ do_kernel_metadata() {
> 
>  	# expand kernel features into their full path equivalents
>  	bsp_definition=$(spp ${includes} --find -DKMACHINE=${KMACHINE} -DKTYPE=${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE})
> +	if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ -z "${bsp_definition}" ]; then

Use $bsp_definition instead of ${bsp_definition} since it is a 
shell variable and not a bitbake variable. 

Actually, after looking at the code in that bbclass, I see this 
used for a number of shell variables all over the place. This is 
actually bad, and you should rewrite the code to not use ${variable} 
for shell variables. The reason this is bad is because these 
variables unnecessarily end up in the sstate hash for these functions, 
and if someone actually happens to define a bitbake variable with the 
same name as one of those shell variables, the result will not be what 
is expected...

> +		bbfatal_log "Could not locate BSP definiton for ${KMACHINE}/${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE}."

Change "definiton" to "definition".

> +	fi
>  	meta_dir=$(kgit --meta)
> 
>  	# run1: pull all the configuration fragments, no matter where they come from
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
> index 2217a31076a2..4a78b897d34f 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kern-tools/kern-tools-native_git.bb
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://git/tools/kgit;beginline=5;endline=9;md5=a6c2fa8aef1b
> 
>  DEPENDS = "git-native"
> 
> -SRCREV = "9cd2b626d652bec10c6bc75275b35bfee74d447c"
> +SRCREV = "0571411cc033c11df7827508dd786876ce2f8c83"
>  PR = "r12"
>  PV = "0.2+git${SRCPV}"
> 
> --
> 2.5.0

//Peter



  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21  2:58 [PATCH 0/9] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] kernel-yocto: configuration updates: x86 features Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] linux-yocto/4.1: fix fsl-ls10xx sdhci Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] linux-yocto: add usb-net configs by default Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] linux-yocto: introduce 4.12 recipes Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] linux-yocto: remove 4.1 recipes Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] libc-headers: update to 4.12 Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] qemu: bump default version " Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are built Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:00   ` Peter Kjellerstedt [this message]
2017-08-21 15:03     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:13       ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:16         ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2017-08-21 15:18           ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23  3:40   ` Khem Raj
2017-08-23 12:37     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23 14:40       ` Khem Raj
2017-08-23 14:42         ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23 14:58           ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-23 15:00             ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-23 15:07             ` Khem Raj
2017-08-23 18:31   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2017-08-23 18:56     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  2:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] linux-yocto/4.10: CVE & misc fixes Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21  3:05 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request Patchwork
2017-08-21 11:42 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Richard Purdie
2017-08-21 12:11   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 13:01     ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 15:55 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-21 15:57   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-21 16:12   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 14:24     ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 14:54       ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 15:28         ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 15:34           ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 16:00             ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 16:04               ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 16:07                 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-22 16:20                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 17:13                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 20:34                   ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-08-22 21:56                     ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b68f37bbad5940a8bdb7f165a7600f18@XBOX02.axis.com \
    --to=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
    --cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox