From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: ✗ patchtest: failure for "libxml2: fix CVE-2018-9251 and..." and 1 more
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 23:16:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fbd032b3ff41ed4fb0656b2d1e8b011e98c8169.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <064dc928-7bbb-b537-75a4-273ecc1dfcfb@windriver.com>
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 15:37 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> On 2018年08月17日 15:32, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: "libxml2: fix CVE-2018-9251 and..." and 1 more
> > Revision: 1
> > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/13574/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> >
> > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core.
> > This is
> > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the
> > proposed
> > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
> >
> >
> >
> > * Issue Upstream-Status is in incorrect format
> > [test_upstream_status_presence_format]
> > Suggested fix Fix Upstream-Status format in 0001-Verify-that-
> > we-are-not-reading-past-end-of-a-buffer.patch
> > Current Upstream-Status: Cherry pick from upstream
> > bugzilla [https://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392447]
> > Standard format Upstream-Status: <Valid status>
> > Valid status Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied,
> > Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where]
>
> I am not sure which one to choose, the patch is not from
> upstream, but its bugzilla, so `Backport' is not accurate
That would be Submitted since upstream are aware of the patch.
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-19 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 7:22 [PATCH 1/2] libxml2: fix CVE-2018-9251 and CVE-2018-14567 Hongxu Jia
2018-08-17 7:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] nasm: fix CVE-2018-8883 & CVE-2018-8882 & CVE-2018-10016 & CVE-2018-10316 Hongxu Jia
2018-08-17 7:32 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for "libxml2: fix CVE-2018-9251 and..." and 1 more Patchwork
2018-08-17 7:37 ` Hongxu Jia
2018-08-19 22:16 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fbd032b3ff41ed4fb0656b2d1e8b011e98c8169.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox