From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] base: make feature backfilling happen earlier
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:34:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97105828.GXrr1zfWsR@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lywquxjmyb.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
On Monday 28 January 2013 17:23:40 Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> writes:
> >> 1. set some defaults on distribution base ...
> >> 2. allow to override these defaults on a per-project base
> >> ...
> >> afaik, DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL + _CONSIDERED exist to allow the first
> >> two point without an '-=' operator which lacks in bitbake.
> >
> > No they don't. They exist to allow adding new features that should be
> > enabled for all existing distro configs without each of those having to
> > be changed, and provide a means for distros to opt out of that enabling
> > if they wish.
> How is this different from my requirements? Ok; atm,
> DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL is pretty useless because it contains only
> 'pulseaudio' which is probably unwanted on >90% of all embedded devices
pulseaudio was enabled already in the recipes that care about it; that was the
point of adding it in the first place so it could be turned off.
> and it is impossible to extend DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL.
It's not intended to be extended; it's for use in OE-Core alone.
> > It's still not clear to me why you could not just set DISTRO_FEATURES
> > directly. If you have values you're likely to want to remove, you can
> > put them in separate variables that you can clear out later.
>
> It is very difficultly to do within distro.conf. E.g. having
>
> | DISTRO_FEATURES = "${@subtract_set('DISTRO_FEATURES',
> | 'UNWANTED_FEATURES')}'
> will probably result into some error regarding recursive expansion.
What I meant was something like:
DISTRO_FEATURES = "${DISTRO_FEATURES_BASIC} ${DISTRO_FEATURES_A}
${DISTRO_FEATURES_B}"
And then in your specific configs:
DISTRO_FEATURES_A = ""
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-28 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 17:52 [PATCH 0/2] DISTRO_FEATURES compatibility fixes Ross Burton
2013-01-24 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf: unbreak all builds with custom DISTRO_FEATURES Ross Burton
2013-01-24 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] base: make feature backfilling happen earlier Ross Burton
2013-01-25 18:06 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-28 12:54 ` Richard Purdie
2013-01-28 13:55 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-28 14:19 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-01-28 14:52 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-28 15:00 ` Phil Blundell
2013-01-28 15:44 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-28 15:58 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-01-28 16:23 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-28 16:34 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-01-29 11:07 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-28 16:15 ` Phil Blundell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97105828.GXrr1zfWsR@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox