Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/5] systemd: update 246 -> 247

["Chen Qi" <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3137 bytes --]

On 12/18/2020 01:25 AM, Luca Bocassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 18:07 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 12:34 +0000, Luca Bocassi wrote:
>>> From: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
>>>
>>> Update systemd to v247.1.
>>> Add rule for new oomd dbus conf and for new pam.d
>>> conf directory in /usr/lib.
>>> Drop selinux-hook-handling-to-enumerate-nexthop.patch,
>>> merged upstream.
>>> Backport 0001-meson-set-cxx-variable-before-using-it.patch
>>> from v247-stable to fix builds without C++.
>>> Refresh musl patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
>>> ---
>>> NOTE: the musl build has only been build-tested, and only on x86_64.
>>> The glibc build has been built and runtime-tested on x86_64 and
>>> arm64.
>> [sorry, hit send early when writing]
>>
>> Unfortunately there is still something not quite right in this patchset
>> as it failed again during testing. There are a few different problems:
>>
>> meta-intel in systemd-boot:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/100/builds/1016
> Looking into this, thanks
>
>> a reproducibility issue in oe-selftest:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/1651
>> (which did happen last time as well on centos but I don't think was
>> reported on the list, sorry)
>>
>> These urls may help understand why its not reproducible:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20201215-mhq8wl33/packages/diff-html/
>> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20201215-mhq8wl33/
>>
>> (looks like the uid of messagebus is changing at a really quick glance)
> Given your follow-up message about host contamination, is there
> anything I can do here to fix it/mitigate it, or is it a CI issue?
>
>> and a build issue in world-lsb:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/108/builds/1189
>>
>> At the top of the logs you can see the configuration that is being used
>> for a given build, so for example in the last one, the key difference
>> to some of the other builds might be any one of:
>>
>> DISTRO = "poky-altcfg"
>> DISTRO_FEATURES_append = ' api-documentation'
>> require conf/multilib.conf
>> MULTILIBS = 'multilib:lib32'
>> DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = 'x86'
>> QEMU_USE_KVM = 'True'
>> INHERIT += 'testimage'
>> SDK_EXT_TYPE = 'minimal'
>> SDK_INCLUDE_TOOLCHAIN = '1'
>>
>> but given its a pam error, I'd strongly suspect the DISTRO = "poky-
>> altcfg" would be the likely trigger.
> ERROR: systemd-1_247.1-r0 do_package: QA Issue: systemd: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any packa
> ge:
>    /usr/lib/pam.d
>    /usr/lib/pam.d/systemd-user
>
> But the recipe has:
>
> FILES_${PN} = " ${base_bindir}/* \
>                 <...>
>                 ${libdir}/pam.d/ \
>
> Shouldn't that match? Did I use the wrong variable?
>
> Thanks!

I think it should be ${nonarch_libdir}, as ${libdir} will be expanded to 
'/usr/lib64' in the above multilib config.

Regards,
Chen Qi

>
>
> 
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4867 bytes --]