Re: [oe-core][PATCHv15 1/6] emptty: add version 0.15.0

["Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>]

On Thu Feb 26, 2026 at 7:09 PM CET, Randolph Sapp wrote:
> On Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 10:45 AM CST, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
>> On Tue Feb 3, 2026 at 2:20 AM CET, Randolph Sapp via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>>> From: Randolph Sapp <rs@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Add emptty, a "Dead simple CLI Display Manager on TTY". This is a
>>> relatively lightweight display manager that supports x11 as well as
>>> wayland through both a CLI and an automatic login mechanism.
>>>
>>> This can effectively replace the custom init scripts for both x11
>>> (xserver-nodm-init) and wayland (weston-init) with a single tool with
>>> more verbose logging capabilities.
>>>
>>> This is split into two recipes. The emptty package provides the binary
>>> and various agnostic configs while the emptty-conf package provides the
>>> default configuration for the application itself. This RPROVIDES
>>> virtual-emptty-conf, allowing other recipes to provide their own
>>> configurations to override the default behavior.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <rs@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hi Randolph,
>>
>> This patch has been in my branch for a week now, but we are seeing some
>> intermittent reproducibility issues.
>>
>> I opened a bugzilla entry by error, as for a second I thought this patch
>> was merged, so details can be found here:
>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16171
>>
>> Diffoscope output is here:
>> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260212-ssslvz6_/packages/diff-html/
>>
>> Can you have a look at what is going wrong please?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mathieu
>
> Now that the source epoch has been addressed [1] should I resubmit this version
> of the series? I won't be changing anything since the RFC [2] for the other
> issue reported on this series didn't get any comments.
>
> [1] https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta?id=70a74fa2bd9c374bd07b89b426a86991b1d93a5f
> [2] https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/117730556
>
> - Randolph

Hi Randolph,

No the action is on my side, I just forgot to take back your series when
I took the source epoch fix.

It will be part of my next build, thanks for the ping.

Thanks,
Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com