From: "Yoann Congal" <yoann.congal@smile.fr>
To: <sudumbha@cisco.com>, <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 1/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-3441 and CVE-2026-3442
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 00:03:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DICS8ZZ99Q7C.25QI9TUSM1VCB@smile.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260502142354.3840615-1-sudumbha@cisco.com>
On Sat May 2, 2026 at 4:23 PM CEST, Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Sudhir Dumbhare <sudumbha@cisco.com>
>
> This patch applies the upstream fix [1], which addresses two out-of-bounds
> read issues in bfd/xcofflink.c within xcoff_link_add_symbols(). The changes
> shown in [2] are referenced by [3] and [4].
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf
> [2] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=bfd/xcofflink.c;h=1781182fa6a3f92e5e91996f8b0dcf3ab192679b;hp=fde21c9f9583baff05e72e390e6bb896d02f9d43;hb=c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf;hpb=d7f532cb3a46527
> [3] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-3441
> [4] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-3442
>
> Reference:
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3441
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3442
> https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3441.html
> https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3442.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudhir Dumbhare <sudumbha@cisco.com>
> ---
> .../binutils/binutils-2.42.inc | 1 +
> .../CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
> index 839d31242e..5d91a41648 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
> @@ -69,5 +69,6 @@ SRC_URI = "\
> file://0028-CVE-2025-11494.patch \
> file://0029-CVE-2025-11839.patch \
> file://0030-CVE-2025-11840.patch \
> + file://CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch \
> "
> S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..28cface2c9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +From 88a051b765a7684b24250907c2dad9fa8cd4124a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
> +Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:16:40 +1030
> +Subject: [PATCH] xcofflink buffer overflows
> +
> +This fixes two fuzzed object file out-of-bounds accesses.
> +
> + * xcofflink.c (xcoff_link_add_symbols): Properly bounds check
> + XTY_LD x_scnlen index. Sanity check r_symndx before using it
> + to index sym hashes.
> +
> +CVE: CVE-2026-3441 CVE-2026-3442
> +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf]
> +
> +(cherry picked from commit c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf)
> +Signed-off-by: Sudhir Dumbhare <sudumbha@cisco.com>
> +---
> + bfd/xcofflink.c | 10 ++++------
> + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> +
Hello,
This patch has a weird format:
> +diff --git a/bfd/xcofflink.c b/bfd/xcofflink.c
> +index e0165d202a9..88c49755c64 100644
> +--- a/bfd/xcofflink.c
> ++++ b/bfd/xcofflink.c
> +@@ -1873,12 +1873,9 @@ xcoff_link_add_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
> + follow its appropriate XTY_SD symbol. The .set pseudo op can
^ here a context line starts with a TAB instead of the usual space.
Can you check please?
> + cause the XTY_LD to not follow the XTY_SD symbol. */
> + {
> +- bool bad;
> +-
> +- bad = false;
> +- if (aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64
> +- >= (size_t) (esym - (bfd_byte *) obj_coff_external_syms (abfd)))
> +- bad = true;
> ++ bool bad = (aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64
> ++ >= ((esym - (bfd_byte *) obj_coff_external_syms (abfd))
> ++ / symesz));
> + if (! bad)
> + {
> + section = xcoff_data (abfd)->csects[aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64];
> +@@ -2244,6 +2241,7 @@ xcoff_link_add_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
> + functions imported from dynamic objects. */
> + if (info->output_bfd->xvec == abfd->xvec
> + && *rel_csect != bfd_und_section_ptr
> ++ && (unsigned long) rel->r_symndx < obj_raw_syment_count (abfd)
> + && obj_xcoff_sym_hashes (abfd)[rel->r_symndx] != NULL)
> + {
> + struct xcoff_link_hash_entry *h;
> +--
^ Also, this line usually has a ending space. Maybe some tool
decided to rewrite spaces, unaware of the patch expected format?
Thanks!
> +2.44.4
--
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-02 14:23 [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 1/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-3441 and CVE-2026-3442 Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-05-02 14:23 ` [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 2/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-4647 Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-05-07 22:03 ` Yoann Congal [this message]
2026-05-13 17:27 ` [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH v2 1/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-3441 and CVE-2026-3442 Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-05-13 17:27 ` [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH v2 2/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-4647 Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-06-03 21:09 ` Yoann Congal
2026-07-06 10:43 ` Yoann Congal
2026-06-03 21:02 ` [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH v2 1/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-3441 and CVE-2026-3442 Yoann Congal
2026-05-13 17:39 ` [scarthgap][PATCH " Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DICS8ZZ99Q7C.25QI9TUSM1VCB@smile.fr \
--to=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sudumbha@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox