Re: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH v2 1/2] binutils: fix CVE-2026-3441 and CVE-2026-3442

["Yoann Congal" <yoann.congal@smile.fr>]

On Wed May 13, 2026 at 7:27 PM CEST, Sudhir Dumbhare -X (sudumbha - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) wrote:
> From: Sudhir Dumbhare <sudumbha@cisco.com>
>
> This patch applies the upstream fix [1], which addresses two out-of-bounds
> read issues in bfd/xcofflink.c within xcoff_link_add_symbols(). The changes
> shown in [2] are referenced by [3] and [4].
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf
> [2] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=bfd/xcofflink.c;h=1781182fa6a3f92e5e91996f8b0dcf3ab192679b;hp=fde21c9f9583baff05e72e390e6bb896d02f9d43;hb=c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf;hpb=d7f532cb3a46527
> [3] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-3441
> [4] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-3442
>
> Reference:
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3441
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3442
> https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3441.html
> https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3442.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudhir Dumbhare <sudumbha@cisco.com>
> ---

Hello,

Thanks for this new version but as far as I can tell, those CVEs also
apply to master and wrynose, can you send the fix for those branches and
ping back here?

Thanks!

> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - fixed tab issue around context lines
>
>  .../binutils/binutils-2.42.inc                |  1 +
>  .../CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch         | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
> index 1a865c45f4..1a91792b13 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.42.inc
> @@ -74,5 +74,6 @@ SRC_URI = "\
>       file://0030-CVE-2025-11840.patch \
>       file://CVE-2025-69647.patch \
>       file://CVE-2025-69648.patch \
> +     file://CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch \
>  "
>  S  = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..ada80e5189
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2026-3441_CVE-2026-3442.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +From a28f517b1e3c3c22d5984e82046dcb844eef63fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
> +Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:16:40 +1030
> +Subject: [PATCH] xcofflink buffer overflows
> +
> +This fixes two fuzzed object file out-of-bounds accesses.
> +
> +	* xcofflink.c (xcoff_link_add_symbols): Properly bounds check
> +	XTY_LD x_scnlen index.  Sanity check r_symndx before using it
> +	to index sym hashes.
> +
> +CVE: CVE-2026-3441 CVE-2026-3442
> +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf]
> +
> +(cherry picked from commit c2bf7de1eb77a91d7a3c86d56408bf57de540faf)
> +Signed-off-by: Sudhir Dumbhare <sudumbha@cisco.com>
> +---
> + bfd/xcofflink.c | 10 ++++------
> + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/bfd/xcofflink.c b/bfd/xcofflink.c
> +index e0165d202a9..88c49755c64 100644
> +--- a/bfd/xcofflink.c
> ++++ b/bfd/xcofflink.c
> +@@ -1873,12 +1873,9 @@ xcoff_link_add_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
> + 	     follow its appropriate XTY_SD symbol.  The .set pseudo op can
> + 	     cause the XTY_LD to not follow the XTY_SD symbol. */
> + 	  {
> +-	    bool bad;
> +-
> +-	    bad = false;
> +-	    if (aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64
> +-		>= (size_t) (esym - (bfd_byte *) obj_coff_external_syms (abfd)))
> +-	      bad = true;
> ++	    bool bad = (aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64
> ++			>= ((esym - (bfd_byte *) obj_coff_external_syms (abfd))
> ++			    / symesz));
> + 	    if (! bad)
> + 	      {
> + 		section = xcoff_data (abfd)->csects[aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64];
> +@@ -2244,6 +2241,7 @@ xcoff_link_add_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
> + 		 functions imported from dynamic objects.  */
> + 	      if (info->output_bfd->xvec == abfd->xvec
> + 		  && *rel_csect != bfd_und_section_ptr
> ++		  && (unsigned long) rel->r_symndx < obj_raw_syment_count (abfd)
> + 		  && obj_xcoff_sym_hashes (abfd)[rel->r_symndx] != NULL)
> + 		{
> + 		  struct xcoff_link_hash_entry *h;
> +-- 
> +2.35.6
> +


-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS