From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jeroen@myspectrum.nl, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] udev-extraconf: fix ifupdown for non hotplug devices
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 09:37:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0573ce7a2fe28ee7ec138194177c09dbc53283a.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407174904.1191173-1-jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 19:49 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>
>
> Commit 160f713917 (udev-extraconf: fix network.sh script did not
> configure hotplugged interfaces, 2024-10-18) fixed ifupdown for
> hotplug devices, but also calls it for non hotplug devices. That
> can cause issue, since they might not expect the ifupdown from
> udev, since it wasn't called before mentioned patch got merged.
>
> For util-linux this can simply be fixed by adding --allow=hotplug.
> Unfortunately busybox doesn't have that option, so a function is
> added to check if the device is marked as allow-hotplug.
>
> Since wilcards are supported adding 'allow-hotplug *' allows to
> restore behaviour of mentioned patch, while this restores the
> original behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>
> ---
> .../udev/udev-extraconf/network.sh | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/network.sh b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/network.sh
> index 500e60ae61..da79f00d5a 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/network.sh
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/network.sh
> @@ -6,6 +6,34 @@ echo "$INTERFACE" | grep -q wifi && exit 0
> # udevd does clearenv(). Export shell PATH to children.
> export PATH
>
> +# udev should only trigger ifupdown for interfaces marked as allow-hotplug
> +# and with util-linux that is as simple as adding --allow=hotplug.
> +# Busybox unfortunately doesn't have this option.
> +# allow-hotplug is a pattern like eth0 /eth* /eth*/1 /eth*=eth.
> +# This function checks if INTERFACE matches an allow-hotplug pattern.
> +
> +allow_hotplug() {
> + allow_hotplug="$(sed -n -e 's/^allow-hotplug \+\([^= ]*\).*/\1/p' /etc/network/interfaces)"
> + for pattern in $allow_hotplug; do
> + options="$(echo $pattern | sed -n -e 's,^/\?[^ /]\+/\(.*\),\1,p')"
> + value="$(echo $pattern | sed -n -e 's,^/\?\([^ /]\+\).*,\1,p')"
> + interfaces="$(ls -d /sys/class/net/$value 2>/dev/null | xargs -r -n 1 basename)"
> + if [ "$options" != "" ]; then
> + interfaces="$(echo $interfaces | awk -v n=$options '{print $n }')"
> + fi
> + echo "$interfaces" | grep -w -q "$INTERFACE"
> + if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> + return 0
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + return 1
> +}
> +
> +if ! allow_hotplug; then
> + exit 0
> +fi
> +
> # if this interface has an entry in /etc/network/interfaces, let ifupdown
> # handle it
> if grep -q "iface \+$INTERFACE" /etc/network/interfaces; then
>
Firstly thanks for the patch, we should try and fix issues like this. I
feel I should mention our code comes from a backdrop of resource
constrained devices and the above code makes me cringe a bit due to the
execution overhead of it.
We've purposefully kept the code called from udev and in our
initscripts relatively minimal/simple as the overhead of executing
multiple programs does build up over time. Taking the above, we have
loops, then pipelines, each of which runs more commands. Each command
has a fork/exec overhead.
Is there some way we can simplify this rather than all the shell
pipelines and loops?
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 17:49 [OE-core] [PATCH] udev-extraconf: fix ifupdown for non hotplug devices Jeroen Hofstee
2025-04-09 8:37 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2025-04-09 9:08 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2025-04-09 9:27 ` Richard Purdie
2025-04-09 10:40 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2025-04-09 10:52 ` Richard Purdie
2025-04-10 10:14 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-04-10 12:17 ` Yoann Congal
2025-04-10 18:32 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2025-04-10 19:05 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-04-09 9:28 ` Mike Looijmans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0573ce7a2fe28ee7ec138194177c09dbc53283a.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeroen@myspectrum.nl \
--cc=jhofstee@victronenergy.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox