From: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core-image-sato-sdk: test image with 512M memory
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:14:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac54d0fd-212d-5ac3-e0d9-3eb774d257b6@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5201d25-ee34-6f55-925a-6a7dbde0abfa@windriver.com>
On 08/16/2019 02:53 PM, Kang Kai wrote:
> On 2019/8/12 下午4:57, Kang Kai wrote:
>> On 2019/7/27 下午4:42, Kang Kai wrote:
>>> On 2019/7/27 上午5:40, richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 05:23 -0400, kai.kang@windriver.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> When run do_testimage for core-image-sato-sdk, it fails to pass test
>>>>> case:
>>>>>
>>>>>> RESULTS - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_failed: FAILED
>>>>>> (0.43s)
>>>>> It is OOM issue and daemon rpc.statd is killed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [ 531.306146] Out of memory: Kill process 193 (rpc.statd) score
>>>>>> 200 or sacrifice child
>>>>> Increase the memory of qemu to 512M to avoid such OOM issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb | 1 +
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>>> b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>>> index d7cc52b52b..f7963d018e 100644
>>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>>> @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ IMAGE_FEATURES += "dev-pkgs tools-sdk \
>>>>> IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-devsrc"
>>>>> +TEST_QEMUPARAMS = "-m 512"
>>>> Any idea what is using so much memory in the image when this happens?
>>>>
>>>> Its rather sad that we can't have NFS+systemd with 256MB memory...
>>>
>>> It caused by stap test case. I minimized the test cases to
>>>
>>> TEST_SUITES = "ping date ssh systemd stap kernelmodule gcc "
>>>
>>> which could reproduce the error.
>>>
>>> And it PASSes testimage that remove stap test from default TEST_SUITES:
>>>
>>> TEST_SUITES_remove = 'stap'
>>>
>>> But I can't reproduce the OOM failure to run stap tests manually.
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> The root cause of test case stap fails is available memory is too
>> low. Compare systemd with sysvinit, memory status are listed:
>>
>> systemd:
>> root@qemux86:~# free -h
>> total used free shared buff/cache
>> available
>> Mem: 239Mi 120Mi 23Mi 8.0Mi 94Mi 100Mi
>> Swap: 0B 0B 0B
>>
>> sysvinit:
>> root@qemux86:~# free -h
>> total used free shared buff/cache
>> available
>> Mem: 239Mi 45Mi 111Mi 0.0Ki 82Mi 184Mi
>> Swap: 0B 0B 0B
>>
>>
>> With systemd, processes of rpc.statd and rpc.mountd take about less
>> than 80M memories.
>> And I compared with Debian 10, they take similar size of memories.
>>
>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>> 464 rpcuser 20 0 56316 51336 2192 S 0.0 20.9 0:00.09
>> rpc.statd
>> 186 root 20 0 30136 27024 2280 S 0.0 11.0 0:00.02
>> rpc.mountd
>>
>>
>> Compare to sysvinit, they take only about 2M and 448K:
>>
>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>> 567 rpcuser 20 0 3444 2372 1792 S 0.0 1.0 0:00.00
>> rpc.statd
>> 677 root 20 0 3700 448 0 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00
>> rpc.mountd
>>
>>
>> I didn't figure out the differences between these 2 ways to start the
>> commands:
>>
>> ExecStart=/usr/sbin/rpc.statd -F $STATD_OPTS
>>
>> Vs.
>>
>> test -x "$NFS_STATD" || NFS_STATD=/usr/sbin/rpc.statd
>> start-stop-daemon --start --exec "$NFS_STATD" --pidfile "$STATD_PID"
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Any more comment here please?
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
>
Hi Richard,
Do you think it's acceptable to use swap as part of this test case? For
example, enable 100M swap before running `stap' and disable it
afterwards? This ensure no oom caused by other software using too much
memory.
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kai
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-26 9:23 [PATCH] core-image-sato-sdk: test image with 512M memory kai.kang
2019-07-26 10:11 ` Alexander Kanavin
2019-07-27 1:35 ` Kang Kai
2019-07-27 8:35 ` Alexander Kanavin
2019-07-29 2:11 ` Kang Kai
2019-07-26 21:40 ` richard.purdie
2019-07-27 8:42 ` Kang Kai
2019-08-12 8:57 ` Kang Kai
2019-08-16 6:53 ` Kang Kai
2019-08-19 9:14 ` ChenQi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac54d0fd-212d-5ac3-e0d9-3eb774d257b6@windriver.com \
--to=qi.chen@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox