From: Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com>
To: <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core-image-sato-sdk: test image with 512M memory
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:53:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5201d25-ee34-6f55-925a-6a7dbde0abfa@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e145097a-2db6-9921-dd3b-1aad00eca440@windriver.com>
On 2019/8/12 下午4:57, Kang Kai wrote:
> On 2019/7/27 下午4:42, Kang Kai wrote:
>> On 2019/7/27 上午5:40, richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 05:23 -0400, kai.kang@windriver.com wrote:
>>>> From: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
>>>>
>>>> When run do_testimage for core-image-sato-sdk, it fails to pass test
>>>> case:
>>>>
>>>>> RESULTS - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_failed: FAILED
>>>>> (0.43s)
>>>> It is OOM issue and daemon rpc.statd is killed:
>>>>
>>>>> [ 531.306146] Out of memory: Kill process 193 (rpc.statd) score
>>>>> 200 or sacrifice child
>>>> Increase the memory of qemu to 512M to avoid such OOM issue.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>> b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>> index d7cc52b52b..f7963d018e 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb
>>>> @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ IMAGE_FEATURES += "dev-pkgs tools-sdk \
>>>> IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-devsrc"
>>>> +TEST_QEMUPARAMS = "-m 512"
>>> Any idea what is using so much memory in the image when this happens?
>>>
>>> Its rather sad that we can't have NFS+systemd with 256MB memory...
>>
>> It caused by stap test case. I minimized the test cases to
>>
>> TEST_SUITES = "ping date ssh systemd stap kernelmodule gcc "
>>
>> which could reproduce the error.
>>
>> And it PASSes testimage that remove stap test from default TEST_SUITES:
>>
>> TEST_SUITES_remove = 'stap'
>>
>> But I can't reproduce the OOM failure to run stap tests manually.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> The root cause of test case stap fails is available memory is too low.
> Compare systemd with sysvinit, memory status are listed:
>
> systemd:
> root@qemux86:~# free -h
> total used free shared buff/cache
> available
> Mem: 239Mi 120Mi 23Mi 8.0Mi 94Mi 100Mi
> Swap: 0B 0B 0B
>
> sysvinit:
> root@qemux86:~# free -h
> total used free shared buff/cache
> available
> Mem: 239Mi 45Mi 111Mi 0.0Ki 82Mi 184Mi
> Swap: 0B 0B 0B
>
>
> With systemd, processes of rpc.statd and rpc.mountd take about less
> than 80M memories.
> And I compared with Debian 10, they take similar size of memories.
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 464 rpcuser 20 0 56316 51336 2192 S 0.0 20.9 0:00.09
> rpc.statd
> 186 root 20 0 30136 27024 2280 S 0.0 11.0 0:00.02
> rpc.mountd
>
>
> Compare to sysvinit, they take only about 2M and 448K:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 567 rpcuser 20 0 3444 2372 1792 S 0.0 1.0 0:00.00
> rpc.statd
> 677 root 20 0 3700 448 0 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00
> rpc.mountd
>
>
> I didn't figure out the differences between these 2 ways to start the
> commands:
>
> ExecStart=/usr/sbin/rpc.statd -F $STATD_OPTS
>
> Vs.
>
> test -x "$NFS_STATD" || NFS_STATD=/usr/sbin/rpc.statd
> start-stop-daemon --start --exec "$NFS_STATD" --pidfile "$STATD_PID"
Hi Richard,
Any more comment here please?
Regards,
Kai
>
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Kai Kang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-26 9:23 [PATCH] core-image-sato-sdk: test image with 512M memory kai.kang
2019-07-26 10:11 ` Alexander Kanavin
2019-07-27 1:35 ` Kang Kai
2019-07-27 8:35 ` Alexander Kanavin
2019-07-29 2:11 ` Kang Kai
2019-07-26 21:40 ` richard.purdie
2019-07-27 8:42 ` Kang Kai
2019-08-12 8:57 ` Kang Kai
2019-08-16 6:53 ` Kang Kai [this message]
2019-08-19 9:14 ` ChenQi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5201d25-ee34-6f55-925a-6a7dbde0abfa@windriver.com \
--to=kai.kang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox