Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Armin Kuster" <akuster808@gmail.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] libseccomp: move recipe from meta-security to core
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:24:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8cb8449-fe11-189a-ef6c-e8e4be02f46e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1spjy70QC18FmqM0mToYOjTwwcuDWtaoo57jqaMi0sLHWg@mail.gmail.com>



On 4/25/21 5:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:26 AM akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/24/21 3:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> riscv32 is not happy
>> that is not supported by libseccomp per their supported arch list. I
>> came across that yesterday.
> I think the problem is when we enable it by default in DISTRO_FEATURES
> perhaps we should add an explicit
>
> DISTRO_FEATURES_remove_riscv32 = "seccomp"
>
> in default-distrovars.inc
sounds good. libseccomp hit master this morning.

-armin
>
>>> ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'libseccomp' (but
>>> /home/jenkins/oe/world/yoe/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_247.6.bb,
>>> /home/jenkins/oe/world/yoe/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls_3.7.1.bb
>>> DEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
>>> libseccomp was skipped: incompatible with host riscv32-yoe-linux (not
>>> in COMPATIBLE_HOST)
>> I suspect we need to exclude the arch for now. I didn't notice any patch
>> to add that yet.
>>
>> -armin
>>> see
>>> http://jenkins.nas-admin.org/view/OE/job/oe_world_qemuriscv32/1123/consoleFull
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 8:56 AM Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ptest results:
>>>> Regression Test Summary
>>>>  tests run: 1404
>>>>  tests skipped: 369
>>>>  tests passed: 1402
>>>>  tests failed: 2
>>>>  tests errored: 154
>>>>
>>>> Add feature_check so that the other recipes who can take
>>>> advantage of this funtionality can enable it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../libseccomp/files/run-ptest                |  4 ++
>>>>  .../libseccomp/libseccomp_2.5.1.bb            | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/files/run-ptest
>>>>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.5.1.bb
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/files/run-ptest b/meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/files/run-ptest
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 00000000000..54b4a63cd2c
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/files/run-ptest
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
>>>> +#!/bin/sh
>>>> +
>>>> +cd tests
>>>> +./regression -a
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.5.1.bb
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 00000000000..667d5da8242
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.5.1.bb
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>>>> +SUMMARY = "interface to seccomp filtering mechanism"
>>>> +DESCRIPTION = "The libseccomp library provides and easy to use, platform independent,interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism: seccomp."
>>>> +SECTION = "security"
>>>> +LICENSE = "LGPL-2.1"
>>>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;beginline=0;endline=1;md5=8eac08d22113880357ceb8e7c37f989f"
>>>> +
>>>> +DEPENDS += "gperf-native"
>>>> +
>>>> +SRCREV = "4bf70431a339a2886ab8c82e9a45378f30c6e6c7"
>>>> +
>>>> +SRC_URI = "git://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp.git;branch=release-2.5 \
>>>> +           file://run-ptest \
>>>> +           "
>>>> +
>>>> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_riscv32 = "null"
>>>> +
>>>> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>>>> +
>>>> +inherit autotools-brokensep pkgconfig ptest features_check
>>>> +
>>>> +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "seccomp"
>>>> +
>>>> +PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
>>>> +PACKAGECONFIG[python] = "--enable-python, --disable-python, python3"
>>>> +
>>>> +DISABLE_STATIC = ""
>>>> +
>>>> +do_compile_ptest() {
>>>> +    oe_runmake -C tests check-build
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +do_install_ptest() {
>>>> +    install -d ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
>>>> +    install -d ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tools
>>>> +    for file in $(find tests/* -executable -type f); do
>>>> +        install -m 744 ${S}/${file} ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tests
>>>> +    done
>>>> +    for file in $(find tests/*.tests -type f); do
>>>> +        install -m 744 ${S}/${file} ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tests
>>>> +    done
>>>> +    for file in $(find tools/* -executable -type f); do
>>>> +        install -m 744 ${S}/${file} ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tools
>>>> +    done
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +FILES_${PN} = "${bindir} ${libdir}/${BPN}.so*"
>>>> +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${libdir}/${PN}/tests/.debug/* ${libdir}/${PN}/tools/.debug"
>>>> +
>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest = "coreutils bash"
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-24 15:56 [PATCH 0/6] Add libseccomp Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] libseccomp: move recipe from meta-security to core Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 16:19   ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2021-04-24 16:55     ` Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 17:18       ` Khem Raj
2021-04-24 22:16   ` Khem Raj
2021-04-25  3:46     ` Khem Raj
2021-04-25 18:27       ` Armin Kuster
2021-04-25 18:26     ` Armin Kuster
2021-04-26  0:10       ` Khem Raj
2021-04-26 14:24         ` Armin Kuster [this message]
2021-04-24 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] qemu: Enable seccomp if FEATURE is set Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] gnutls: " Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 15:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] systemd: " Armin Kuster
2021-04-26  6:42   ` [OE-core] " Mikko Rapeli
2021-04-24 15:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] packagegroups/packagegroup-base: add seccomp grp Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 16:23   ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2021-04-24 16:57     ` Armin Kuster
2021-04-24 15:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] default-distrovars.inc: Add seccomp to DISTRO_FEATURES_DEFAULT Armin Kuster
     [not found] ` <1678D666E2EA61E5.6439@lists.openembedded.org>
2021-04-25 19:17   ` [OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] libseccomp: move recipe from meta-security to core Armin Kuster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8cb8449-fe11-189a-ef6c-e8e4be02f46e@gmail.com \
    --to=akuster808@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox