* [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one.
@ 2013-05-26 14:03 Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] vte: add 0.34.5 recipe Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-29 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marko Lindqvist @ 2013-05-26 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
RFC only! Patch is only build-tested.
Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE core.
Later versions depend on gtk3. Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)
that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must
contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by
other programs).
This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside
with 0.28.2 version.
How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected despite gtk3-version being newer?
- ML
The following changes since commit 8f5bc47729edb8cb051d81e9ff1680cb8d2eca25:
dropbear: a fix for hang in dropbearkey, built for x32 (2013-05-24 14:14:30 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib cazfi/rfc
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=cazfi/rfc
Marko Lindqvist (1):
vte: add 0.34.5 recipe
.../vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch | 14 ++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc | 4 +++-
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb | 6 ++++--
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb | 12 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] vte: add 0.34.5 recipe
2013-05-26 14:03 [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Marko Lindqvist
@ 2013-05-26 14:03 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-29 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Burton, Ross
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marko Lindqvist @ 2013-05-26 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Add latest vte version for gtk3-based systems. Keep 0.28.2 as it's last
gtk2-compatible version.
Signed-off-by: Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com>
---
.../vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch | 14 ++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc | 4 +++-
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb | 6 ++++--
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb | 12 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6763d37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691545]
+
+Signed-off-by: Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com>
+diff -Nurd vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in
+--- vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in 2010-07-15 20:08:44.000000000 +0300
++++ vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in 2013-01-11 14:50:34.971027440 +0200
+@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
+ AC_ISC_POSIX
+ AC_PROG_CC
+ AC_STDC_HEADERS
+-AM_PROG_CC_STDC
+
+ if test -z "$enable_maintainer_mode"; then
+ enable_maintainer_mode=yes
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc
index b653fab..bc9736a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
DESCRIPTION = "vte is a virtual terminal emulator"
BUGTRACKER = "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=vte"
LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+"
-DEPENDS = " glib-2.0 gtk+ intltool-native ncurses gobject-introspection-stub"
+DEPENDS = " glib-2.0 intltool-native ncurses gobject-introspection-stub"
RDEPENDS_libvte = "vte-termcap"
+GNOME_COMPRESS_TYPE = "xz"
+
inherit gnome gtk-doc
EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-python --disable-introspection"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb
index 485187d..caf7515 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb
@@ -6,5 +6,7 @@ PR = "r6"
SRC_URI += "file://obsolete_automake_macros.patch"
-SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "f07a4bf943194f94b7f142db8f7f36dc"
-SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "8d04e202b617373dfb47689e5e628febe2c58840b34cccc4af4feb88c48df903"
+SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "497f26e457308649e6ece32b3bb142ff"
+SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "86cf0b81aa023fa93ed415653d51c96767f20b2d7334c893caba71e42654b0ae"
+
+DEPENDS += "gtk+"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8707213
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+require vte.inc
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=3bf50002aefd002f49e7bb854063f7e7"
+
+PR = "r0"
+
+SRC_URI += "file://obsolete_automake_macros.patch"
+
+SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "ce1f11568992df8e61c9366918fed571"
+SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "8847fb75b620a94ba62c2ffd9e1653396978106f294574ba24a19ced259a7351"
+
+DEPENDS += "gtk+3"
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one.
2013-05-26 14:03 [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] vte: add 0.34.5 recipe Marko Lindqvist
@ 2013-05-29 10:14 ` Burton, Ross
2013-05-29 22:14 ` Marko Lindqvist
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2013-05-29 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marko Lindqvist; +Cc: openembedded-core
On 26 May 2013 15:03, Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com> wrote:
> Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE core.
> Later versions depend on gtk3.
vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.
> Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
> sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)
> that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must
> contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by
> other programs).
> This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside
> with 0.28.2 version.
> How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected despite gtk3-version being newer?
Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3
vte vte3_3.34.5.bb?
Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one.
2013-05-29 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Burton, Ross
@ 2013-05-29 22:14 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-29 22:58 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marko Lindqvist @ 2013-05-29 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1233 bytes --]
On 29 May 2013 13:14, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> On 26 May 2013 15:03, Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE
> core.
> > Later versions depend on gtk3.
>
> vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.
>
0.30.0 NEWS states that "dropped support for gtk2". While this sounds like
upstream 0.28.2 would work with either gtk2 or gtk3, OE recipe depends on
"gtk+", which is always gtk2?
> > Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
> > sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)
> > that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must
> > contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by
> > other programs).
> > This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside
> > with 0.28.2 version.
> > How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected
> despite gtk3-version being newer?
>
> Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3
> vte vte3_3.34.5.bb?
>
I think calling it vte3 would be confusing at best, when vte itself is not
version 3.x. How about "vte-gtk3"?
- ML
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one.
2013-05-29 22:14 ` Marko Lindqvist
@ 2013-05-29 22:58 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2013-05-29 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marko Lindqvist; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1635 bytes --]
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 May 2013 13:14, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On 26 May 2013 15:03, Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE
>> core.
>> > Later versions depend on gtk3.
>>
>> vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.
>>
>
> 0.30.0 NEWS states that "dropped support for gtk2". While this sounds
> like upstream 0.28.2 would work with either gtk2 or gtk3, OE recipe depends
> on "gtk+", which is always gtk2?
>
>
>> > Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
>> > sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)
>> > that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must
>> > contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by
>> > other programs).
>> > This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5,
>> alongside
>> > with 0.28.2 version.
>> > How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected
>> despite gtk3-version being newer?
>>
>> Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3
>> vte vte3_3.34.5.bb?
>>
>
> I think calling it vte3 would be confusing at best, when vte itself is
> not version 3.x. How about "vte-gtk3"?
>
So I would say to rename vte to vte-gtk2 at same time and make it provide
vte for now.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-29 22:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-26 14:03 [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] vte: add 0.34.5 recipe Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-29 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one Burton, Ross
2013-05-29 22:14 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-05-29 22:58 ` Otavio Salvador
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox