Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/1] Revised pseudo-fchmodat (updated upstream-status)
@ 2014-05-21 23:12 Peter Seebach
  2014-05-21 23:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits Peter Seebach
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Seebach @ 2014-05-21 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OE-core

This is the pseudo-fchmodat patch, same code, but with an upstream-status
thing to indicate that it's a backport. (Slightly complicated because this
was three patches in the upstream branch, and I just merged in the combined
results so it'd be easier to see what was happening, and no one would have
to review a patch and reject it for obvious bugs that are fixed in the
next patch.)

The following changes since commit f1727bb18f35ff01e53d3d442a6ff3c613639fa6:

  guile: Update to 2.0.11 version (2014-05-21 10:50:37 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib seebs/pseudo-fchmodat2
  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=seebs/pseudo-fchmodat2

Peter Seebach (1):
  pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits

 .../pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch |  107 ++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.5.1.bb       |    3 +-
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits
  2014-05-21 23:12 [PATCH 0/1] Revised pseudo-fchmodat (updated upstream-status) Peter Seebach
@ 2014-05-21 23:12 ` Peter Seebach
  2014-05-27 19:01   ` WARNING: FILES GETTING MARKED WORLD-WRITEABLE. (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits) Peter Seebach
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Seebach @ 2014-05-21 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OE-core

It turns out that pseudo's decision not to report errors from
the host system's fchmodat() can break GNU tar in a very strange
way, resulting in directories being mode 0700 instead of whatever
they should have been.

Additionally, it turns out that if you make directories in your
rootfs mode 777, that results in the local copies being mode 777,
which could allow a hypothetical attacker with access to the
machine to add files to your rootfs image. We should mask out
the 022 bits when making actual mode changes in the rootfs.

This patch represents a backport to the 1.5.1 branch of three
patches from the 1.6 branch, because it took a couple of tries
to get this quite right.

Signed-off-by: Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@windriver.com>
---
 .../pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch |  107 ++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.5.1.bb       |    3 +-
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2bd2289
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/files/pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+commit 5a6f2896ed44029ced2a33ac64c962737c5171a0
+Author: Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@windriver.com>
+Date:   Fri May 16 15:53:06 2014 -0500
+
+    permissions updates: improve fchmodat, mask out write bits
+
+    Upstream-Status: Backport of several patches from 1.6 branch,
+    combined.
+    
+    Backport from pseudo 1.6 of improvements to fchmodat (handle
+    AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW by rejecting it if the host system does,
+    to make GNU tar happier), also mask out write bits from filesystem
+    modes to avoid security problems.
+
+    The 1.6 patches are:
+
+    87c53ea58befef48677846693aab445df1850e16
+    3c716e0bab4f0cfe4be84caa9ce5fd5e3f5e2a23
+    c98e4f43b5d6499748a5057134408f4ba4854fb4
+
+diff --git a/ChangeLog.txt b/ChangeLog.txt
+index 113f675..fab1033 100644
+--- a/ChangeLog.txt
++++ b/ChangeLog.txt
+@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
++2014-05-16:
++	* (seebs) fchmodat: don't drop flags, report failures, to improve
++	  compatibility/consistency. Cache the knowledge that
++	  AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW gets ENOTSUP.
++	* (seebs) mask out group/other write bits in real filesystem to
++	  reduce risks when assembling a rootfs including world-writeable
++	  directories.
++
++2014-05-15:
++	* (seebs) drop flags when calling fchmodat() to appease GNU tar.
++
+ 2013-02-27:
+ 	* (seebs) Oh, hey, what if I took out my debug messages?
+ 	* (seebs) update docs a bit to reduce bitrot
+diff --git a/ports/unix/guts/fchmodat.c b/ports/unix/guts/fchmodat.c
+index 59a92ce..69a953c 100644
+--- a/ports/unix/guts/fchmodat.c
++++ b/ports/unix/guts/fchmodat.c
+@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
+  */
+ 	PSEUDO_STATBUF buf;
+ 	int save_errno = errno;
++	static int picky_fchmodat = 0;
+ 
+ #ifdef PSEUDO_NO_REAL_AT_FUNCTIONS
+ 	if (dirfd != AT_FDCWD) {
+@@ -15,6 +16,16 @@
+ 		return -1;
+ 	}
+ 	if (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) {
++		/* Linux, as of this writing, will always reject this.
++		 * GNU tar relies on getting the rejection. To cut down
++		 * on traffic, we check for the failure, and if we saw
++		 * a failure previously, we reject it right away and tell
++		 * the caller to retry.
++		 */
++		if (picky_fchmodat) {
++			errno = ENOTSUP;
++			return -1;
++		}
+ 		rc = base_lstat(path, &buf);
+ 	} else {
+ 		rc = base_stat(path, &buf);
+@@ -50,13 +61,22 @@
+ 
+ 	/* user bits added so "root" can always access files. */
+ #ifdef PSEUDO_NO_REAL_AT_FUNCTIONS
+-	/* note:  if path was a symlink, and AT_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS was
++	/* note:  if path was a symlink, and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW was
+ 	 * specified, we already bailed previously. */
+ 	real_chmod(path, PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, S_ISDIR(buf.st_mode)));
+ #else
+-	real_fchmodat(dirfd, path, PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, S_ISDIR(buf.st_mode)), flags);
++	rc = real_fchmodat(dirfd, path, PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, S_ISDIR(buf.st_mode)), flags);
++	/* AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW isn't supported by fchmodat. GNU tar
++	 * tries to use it anyway, figuring it can just retry if that
++	 * fails. So we want to report that *particular* failure instead
++	 * of doing the fallback.
++	 */
++	if (rc == -1 && errno == ENOTSUP && (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)) {
++		picky_fchmodat = 1;
++		return -1;
++	}
+ #endif
+-	/* we ignore a failure from underlying fchmod, because pseudo
++	/* we otherwise ignore failures from underlying fchmod, because pseudo
+ 	 * may believe you are permitted to change modes that the filesystem
+ 	 * doesn't. Note that we also don't need to know whether the
+          * file might be a (pseudo) block device or some such; pseudo
+diff --git a/pseudo_client.h b/pseudo_client.h
+index f36a772..ecb13a6 100644
+--- a/pseudo_client.h
++++ b/pseudo_client.h
+@@ -85,6 +85,6 @@ extern int pseudo_nosymlinkexp;
+  * None of this will behave very sensibly if umask has 0700 bits in it;
+  * this is a known limitation.
+  */
+-#define PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, isdir) ((mode) | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | ((isdir) ? S_IXUSR : 0))
+-#define PSEUDO_DB_MODE(fs_mode, user_mode) (((fs_mode) & ~0700) | ((user_mode & 0700)))
++#define PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, isdir) ((((mode) | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | ((isdir) ? S_IXUSR : 0)) & ~(S_IWGRP | S_IWOTH)) & ~(S_IWOTH | S_IWGRP))
++#define PSEUDO_DB_MODE(fs_mode, user_mode) (((fs_mode) & ~0722) | ((user_mode & 0722)))
+ 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.5.1.bb
index 215cdb8..47291fd 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.5.1.bb
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 require pseudo.inc
 
-PR = "r4"
+PR = "r5"
 
 SRC_URI = " \
     http://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/${BPN}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
     file://0001-pseudo_has_unload-add-function.patch \
     file://shutdownping.patch \
     file://pseudo-1.5.1-install-directory-mode.patch \
+    file://pseudo-fchmodat-permissions.patch \
 "
 
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "5ec67c7bff5fe68c56de500859c19172"
-- 
1.7.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* WARNING: FILES GETTING MARKED WORLD-WRITEABLE. (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits)
  2014-05-21 23:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits Peter Seebach
@ 2014-05-27 19:01   ` Peter Seebach
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Seebach @ 2014-05-27 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Seebach; +Cc: OE-core

On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:12:33 -0500
Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@windriver.com> wrote:

> +-#define PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, isdir) ((mode) | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | ((isdir) ? S_IXUSR : 0))
> +-#define PSEUDO_DB_MODE(fs_mode, user_mode) (((fs_mode) & ~0700) | ((user_mode & 0700)))
> ++#define PSEUDO_FS_MODE(mode, isdir) ((((mode) | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | ((isdir) ? S_IXUSR : 0)) & ~(S_IWGRP | S_IWOTH)) & ~(S_IWOTH | S_IWGRP))
> ++#define PSEUDO_DB_MODE(fs_mode, user_mode) (((fs_mode) & ~0722) | ((user_mode & 0722)))

So, someone just spotted a bug this introduces.

In the case where you're calling chmod, this produces exactly the results you
probably expect: Files end up with the specified mode in the database, and
with 022 masked out and 0700 masked in on the filesystem.

If you're using open or mkdir, though, the old code was picking up changes to
the mode from umask in the 077 bits (typically, 022), and the new code
doesn't because I ignore the 022 bits in the filesystem since I know I masked
them out.

I don't know how to solve this correctly yet, but basically I should be
taking umask into account.

I'll try to get a patch out for this ASAP.

-s
-- 
Listen, get this.  Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-27 19:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-21 23:12 [PATCH 0/1] Revised pseudo-fchmodat (updated upstream-status) Peter Seebach
2014-05-21 23:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits Peter Seebach
2014-05-27 19:01   ` WARNING: FILES GETTING MARKED WORLD-WRITEABLE. (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pseudo: handle fchmodat better, mask out unwanted write bits) Peter Seebach

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox