[PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[bruce.ashfield]

From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>

Richard,

As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
default.

I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.

Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1

Bruce

The following changes since commit 3c3fd6a65e8103f74ae382d196d486b31a168b39:

  insane: Improve patch warning/error handling (2023-01-21 07:46:38 +0000)

are available in the Git repository at:

  https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel
  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel

Bruce Ashfield (2):
  linux-yocto/5.19: drop recipes
  conf/qemu: bump preferred kernel version to 6.1

 meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc    |  2 +-
 meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf              |  2 +-
 .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb              | 45 ------------
 .../linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb            | 30 --------
 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb | 70 -------------------
 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 1/2] linux-yocto/5.19: drop recipes

[bruce.ashfield]

From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>

5.19 is no longer getting upstream -stable support, and we've replaced
it with 6.1 as the latest (and default) version. Removing the recipes
to make this clear.

Released branches will still get bugfixes as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
---
 .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb              | 45 ------------
 .../linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb            | 30 --------
 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb | 70 -------------------
 3 files changed, 145 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb
deleted file mode 100644
index f4d205e613..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-KBRANCH ?= "v5.19/standard/preempt-rt/base"
-
-require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
-
-# Skip processing of this recipe if it is not explicitly specified as the
-# PREFERRED_PROVIDER for virtual/kernel. This avoids errors when trying
-# to build multiple virtual/kernel providers, e.g. as dependency of
-# core-image-rt-sdk, core-image-rt.
-python () {
-    if d.getVar("KERNEL_PACKAGE_NAME") == "kernel" and d.getVar("PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel") != "linux-yocto-rt":
-        raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("Set PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel to linux-yocto-rt to enable it")
-}
-
-SRCREV_machine ?= "3101c367eab8952721086b545ad37c301b2a7452"
-SRCREV_meta ?= "239a6c0d3c3b046971909f1e066380465b0c331d"
-
-SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git;branch=${KBRANCH};name=machine \
-           git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-kernel-cache;type=kmeta;name=meta;branch=yocto-5.19;destsuffix=${KMETA}"
-
-LINUX_VERSION ?= "5.19.17"
-
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6bc538ed5bd9a7fc9398086aedcd7e46"
-
-DEPENDS += "${@bb.utils.contains('ARCH', 'x86', 'elfutils-native', '', d)}"
-DEPENDS += "openssl-native util-linux-native"
-
-PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}"
-
-KMETA = "kernel-meta"
-KCONF_BSP_AUDIT_LEVEL = "1"
-
-LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE = "preempt-rt"
-
-COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "^(qemux86|qemux86-64|qemuarm|qemuarmv5|qemuarm64|qemuppc|qemumips)$"
-
-KERNEL_DEVICETREE:qemuarmv5 = "versatile-pb.dtb"
-
-# Functionality flags
-KERNEL_EXTRA_FEATURES ?= "features/netfilter/netfilter.scc features/taskstats/taskstats.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = " ${KERNEL_EXTRA_FEATURES}"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:qemuall=" cfg/virtio.scc features/drm-bochs/drm-bochs.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:qemux86=" cfg/sound.scc cfg/paravirt_kvm.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:qemux86-64=" cfg/sound.scc cfg/paravirt_kvm.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = "${@bb.utils.contains("DISTRO_FEATURES", "ptest", " features/scsi/scsi-debug.scc", "", d)}"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = "${@bb.utils.contains("DISTRO_FEATURES", "ptest", " features/gpio/mockup.scc", "", d)}"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb
deleted file mode 100644
index 95a8a46bbc..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-KBRANCH ?= "v5.19/standard/tiny/base"
-
-LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE = "tiny"
-KCONFIG_MODE = "--allnoconfig"
-
-require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
-
-LINUX_VERSION ?= "5.19.17"
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6bc538ed5bd9a7fc9398086aedcd7e46"
-
-DEPENDS += "${@bb.utils.contains('ARCH', 'x86', 'elfutils-native', '', d)}"
-DEPENDS += "openssl-native util-linux-native"
-
-KMETA = "kernel-meta"
-KCONF_BSP_AUDIT_LEVEL = "2"
-
-SRCREV_machine ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_meta ?= "239a6c0d3c3b046971909f1e066380465b0c331d"
-
-PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}"
-
-SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git;branch=${KBRANCH};name=machine \
-           git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-kernel-cache;type=kmeta;name=meta;branch=yocto-5.19;destsuffix=${KMETA}"
-
-COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "^(qemux86|qemux86-64|qemuarm64|qemuarm|qemuarmv5)$"
-
-# Functionality flags
-KERNEL_FEATURES = ""
-
-KERNEL_DEVICETREE:qemuarmv5 = "versatile-pb.dtb"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb
deleted file mode 100644
index 5baa0c1130..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
-KBRANCH ?= "v5.19/standard/base"
-
-require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
-
-# board specific branches
-KBRANCH:qemuarm  ?= "v5.19/standard/arm-versatile-926ejs"
-KBRANCH:qemuarm64 ?= "v5.19/standard/qemuarm64"
-KBRANCH:qemumips ?= "v5.19/standard/mti-malta32"
-KBRANCH:qemuppc  ?= "v5.19/standard/qemuppc"
-KBRANCH:qemuriscv64  ?= "v5.19/standard/base"
-KBRANCH:qemuriscv32  ?= "v5.19/standard/base"
-KBRANCH:qemux86  ?= "v5.19/standard/base"
-KBRANCH:qemux86-64 ?= "v5.19/standard/base"
-KBRANCH:qemumips64 ?= "v5.19/standard/mti-malta64"
-
-SRCREV_machine:qemuarm ?= "f30404d233fc4cc461a0800fd635f4e9650a20a5"
-SRCREV_machine:qemuarm64 ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_machine:qemumips ?= "ceaf2134635845794c24b750f15004096a597256"
-SRCREV_machine:qemuppc ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_machine:qemuriscv64 ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_machine:qemuriscv32 ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_machine:qemux86 ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_machine:qemux86-64 ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_machine:qemumips64 ?= "acf9ebb1e7d1ceb61a89ec33ca4cc3613287630b"
-SRCREV_machine ?= "84f2f8e7a625aae0fa9e7027a2e774b99b646cf7"
-SRCREV_meta ?= "239a6c0d3c3b046971909f1e066380465b0c331d"
-
-# set your preferred provider of linux-yocto to 'linux-yocto-upstream', and you'll
-# get the <version>/base branch, which is pure upstream -stable, and the same
-# meta SRCREV as the linux-yocto-standard builds. Select your version using the
-# normal PREFERRED_VERSION settings.
-BBCLASSEXTEND = "devupstream:target"
-SRCREV_machine:class-devupstream ?= "2b525314c7b57eac29fe8b77a6589428e4a4f6dd"
-PN:class-devupstream = "linux-yocto-upstream"
-KBRANCH:class-devupstream = "v5.19/base"
-
-SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto.git;name=machine;branch=${KBRANCH}; \
-           git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-kernel-cache;type=kmeta;name=meta;branch=yocto-5.19;destsuffix=${KMETA}"
-
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6bc538ed5bd9a7fc9398086aedcd7e46"
-LINUX_VERSION ?= "5.19.17"
-
-DEPENDS += "${@bb.utils.contains('ARCH', 'x86', 'elfutils-native', '', d)}"
-DEPENDS += "openssl-native util-linux-native"
-DEPENDS += "gmp-native libmpc-native"
-
-PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}"
-
-KMETA = "kernel-meta"
-KCONF_BSP_AUDIT_LEVEL = "1"
-
-KERNEL_DEVICETREE:qemuarmv5 = "versatile-pb.dtb"
-
-COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "^(qemuarm|qemuarmv5|qemuarm64|qemux86|qemuppc|qemuppc64|qemumips|qemumips64|qemux86-64|qemuriscv64|qemuriscv32)$"
-
-# Functionality flags
-KERNEL_EXTRA_FEATURES ?= "features/netfilter/netfilter.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = " ${KERNEL_EXTRA_FEATURES}"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:qemuall=" cfg/virtio.scc features/drm-bochs/drm-bochs.scc cfg/net/mdio.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:qemux86=" cfg/sound.scc cfg/paravirt_kvm.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:qemux86-64=" cfg/sound.scc cfg/paravirt_kvm.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = " ${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", " cfg/x32.scc", "", d)}"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = " ${@bb.utils.contains("DISTRO_FEATURES", "ptest", " features/scsi/scsi-debug.scc", "", d)}"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append = " ${@bb.utils.contains("DISTRO_FEATURES", "ptest", " features/gpio/mockup.scc", "", d)}"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:powerpc =" arch/powerpc/powerpc-debug.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:powerpc64 =" arch/powerpc/powerpc-debug.scc"
-KERNEL_FEATURES:append:powerpc64le =" arch/powerpc/powerpc-debug.scc"
-
-INSANE_SKIP:kernel-vmlinux:qemuppc64 = "textrel"
-
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 2/2] conf/qemu: bump preferred kernel version to 6.1

[bruce.ashfield]

From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>

6.1 has been soaking for a while now, so it is time to bump the
default qemu version to 6.1 and prepare to remove 5.19.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
---
 meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc | 2 +-
 meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf           | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc
index 4052eacdb5..c3cc0dbff6 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ SERIAL_CONSOLES ?= "115200;ttyS0"
 # kernel-related variables
 #
 PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ??= "linux-yocto"
-PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ??= "5.19%"
+PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ??= "6.1%"
 
 #
 # XSERVER subcomponents, used to build the XSERVER variable
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf b/meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf
index fe6c0117a8..6e59e42c3a 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf
@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ QB_GRAPHICS = "-device virtio-gpu-pci"
 QB_OPT_APPEND = "-device qemu-xhci -device usb-tablet -device usb-kbd"
 QB_DTB = "${@oe.utils.version_less_or_equal('PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto', '4.7', '', 'zImage-versatile-pb.dtb', d)}"
 
-PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ??= "5.19%"
+PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ??= "6.1%"
 KMACHINE:qemuarmv5 = "arm-versatile-926ejs"
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> 
> Richard,
> 
> As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> default.
> 
> I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> 
> Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1

Thanks!

I think the issues are:

a) two selftest failures:

  oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
  oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi

b) meta-arm issues

c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)

I suspect we can switch poky-tiny and defer the removal patches for a
few days to give meta-arm time to sort itself out. The only question
then becomes the selftest issues. I'm taking a quick look to see if
they're simple to sort.

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Richard,
> > 
> > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > default.
> > 
> > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > 
> > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I think the issues are:
> 
> a) two selftest failures:
> 
>   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
>   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> 
> b) meta-arm issues
> 
> c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> 

Unfortunately, I have to add

d) perf reproducibility issues:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio

> I suspect we can switch poky-tiny and defer the removal patches for a
> few days to give meta-arm time to sort itself out. The only question
> then becomes the selftest issues. I'm taking a quick look to see if
> they're simple to sort.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard

> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#176392): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176392
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/3617179
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > Richard,
> > > 
> > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > default.
> > > 
> > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > 
> > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > I think the issues are:
> > 
> > a) two selftest failures:
> > 
> >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > 
> > b) meta-arm issues
> > 
> > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, I have to add
> 
> d) perf reproducibility issues:
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio

Ahrrg.

http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/


/lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h

from

#define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io

to

#define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"

Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?

We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
things...

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Richard,
> > > >
> > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > > default.
> > > >
> > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > >
> > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > I think the issues are:
> > >
> > > a) two selftest failures:
> > >
> > >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> > >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > >
> > > b) meta-arm issues
> > >
> > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > >
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have to add
> >
> > d) perf reproducibility issues:
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio
>
> Ahrrg.
>
> http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/
>
>
> /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h
>
> from
>
> #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io
>
> to
>
> #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"
>
> Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?
>

My perf build just finished and I was just starting to poke into it.

I'll have a look now.

Let me know if you come up with anything in the meantime, I'll do the same.

At the worst, I imagine we can sed the value to something consistent.

Bruce

> We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
> things...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Richard,
> > > >
> > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > > default.
> > > >
> > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > >
> > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > I think the issues are:
> > >
> > > a) two selftest failures:
> > >
> > >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> > >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > >
> > > b) meta-arm issues
> > >
> > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > >
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have to add
> >
> > d) perf reproducibility issues:
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio
>
> Ahrrg.
>
> http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/
>
>
> /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h
>
> from
>
> #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io
>
> to
>
> #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"
>
> Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?
>
> We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
> things...

Interesting. In my local builds:

#define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST      "oe-host"

I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference.

The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export
KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host",
and has been that way for a while.

I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test
should have caught
those if that was the issue.

Bruce

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Richard,
> > > > > 
> > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > > > default.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > I think the issues are:
> > > > 
> > > > a) two selftest failures:
> > > > 
> > > >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> > > >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > > > 
> > > > b) meta-arm issues
> > > > 
> > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, I have to add
> > > 
> > > d) perf reproducibility issues:
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio
> > 
> > Ahrrg.
> > 
> > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/
> > 
> > 
> > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h
> > 
> > from
> > 
> > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"
> > 
> > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?
> > 
> > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
> > things...
> 
> Interesting. In my local builds:
> 
> #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST      "oe-host"
> 
> I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference.
> 
> The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export
> KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host",
> and has been that way for a while.
> 
> I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test
> should have caught
> those if that was the issue.


I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is
kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did
reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with
perf...

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Khem Raj]

we need to define

KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto"
KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto"

in linux-yocto defconfigs

You can use my name too :)

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie
> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Richard,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > > > > default.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the issues are:
> > > > >
> > > > > a) two selftest failures:
> > > > >
> > > > >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> > > > >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > > > >
> > > > > b) meta-arm issues
> > > > >
> > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, I have to add
> > > >
> > > > d) perf reproducibility issues:
> > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio
> > >
> > > Ahrrg.
> > >
> > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/
> > >
> > >
> > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h
> > >
> > > from
> > >
> > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"
> > >
> > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?
> > >
> > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
> > > things...
> >
> > Interesting. In my local builds:
> >
> > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST      "oe-host"
> >
> > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference.
> >
> > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export
> > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host",
> > and has been that way for a while.
> >
> > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test
> > should have caught
> > those if that was the issue.
>
>
> I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is
> kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did
> reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with
> perf...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#176414): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176414
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/1997914
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> we need to define
>
> KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto"
> KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto"
>
> in linux-yocto defconfigs
>

No, we really don't want to do that.

There's an environment variable that is supposed to be reflected in
the build. Which we already set.

If that has changed in 6.1, then I'll come up with a patch as required.

Bruce

> You can use my name too :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie
> > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Richard,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > > > > > default.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think the issues are:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a) two selftest failures:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> > > > > >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > b) meta-arm issues
> > > > > >
> > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add
> > > > >
> > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues:
> > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio
> > > >
> > > > Ahrrg.
> > > >
> > > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h
> > > >
> > > > from
> > > >
> > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"
> > > >
> > > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?
> > > >
> > > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
> > > > things...
> > >
> > > Interesting. In my local builds:
> > >
> > > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST      "oe-host"
> > >
> > > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference.
> > >
> > > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export
> > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host",
> > > and has been that way for a while.
> > >
> > > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test
> > > should have caught
> > > those if that was the issue.
> >
> >
> > I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is
> > kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did
> > reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with
> > perf...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> > View/Reply Online (#176414): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176414
> > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/1997914
> > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com]
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >



-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:06 AM Bruce Ashfield
<bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > we need to define
> >
> > KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto"
> > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto"
> >
> > in linux-yocto defconfigs
> >
>
> No, we really don't want to do that.
>
> There's an environment variable that is supposed to be reflected in
> the build. Which we already set.

a better location would be distro config defining it and derived
distros can override it if needed.

>
> If that has changed in 6.1, then I'll come up with a patch as required.
>
> Bruce
>
> > You can use my name too :)
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie
> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie
> > > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Richard,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the
> > > > > > > > default.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this
> > > > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting
> > > > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think the issues are:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a) two selftest failures:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify
> > > > > > >   oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add
> > > > > >
> > > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues:
> > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio
> > > > >
> > > > > Ahrrg.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h
> > > > >
> > > > > from
> > > > >
> > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io
> > > > >
> > > > > to
> > > > >
> > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST»      "ubuntu2004-ty-1"
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value?
> > > > >
> > > > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves
> > > > > things...
> > > >
> > > > Interesting. In my local builds:
> > > >
> > > > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST      "oe-host"
> > > >
> > > > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference.
> > > >
> > > > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export
> > > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host",
> > > > and has been that way for a while.
> > > >
> > > > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test
> > > > should have caught
> > > > those if that was the issue.
> > >
> > >
> > > I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is
> > > kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did
> > > reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with
> > > perf...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> > > View/Reply Online (#176414): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176414
> > > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/1997914
> > > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com]
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end
> - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II