Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] meta: uboot-config: Fix broken menuconfig for "fitImage" kernel

[Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>]

Hi Mike,

On 5/28/24 7:20 AM, mike.looijmans@topic.nl wrote:
> [You don't often get email from mike.looijmans@topic.nl. Learn why this 
> is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> On 24-05-2024 12:22, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 15:43 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>> I was about to comment on the v2 that this should rather be a class :)
>>> Do we have some information on how/why this is the direction the project
>>> should move towards? What are the pitfalls we're trying to avoid, or
>>> benefits we want to gain? Or is this just some better/best practice we
>>> want to go for?
>> There was a post from me a while back complaining about repeatedly
>> splitting class files into smaller less manageable ones so that people
>> could access some variables without the task/function side effects.
>>
>> I have a belief that more configuration files would help this kind of
>> problem and make classes more specific/focused and usable.
>>
> Okay, so what is now the way forward? v1 or v2?
> 

Go for what Richard asked, he's the maintainer after all :) I was merely 
trying to understand the position of the project, not suggesting we do 
something else.

I think you've already sent a v2, so just wait for reviews or for it to 
be merged. If it isn't merged in the next few weeks, then send a 
reminder as an answer to your v2 asking for feedback.

Cheers,
Quentin