Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] meta: uboot-config: Fix broken menuconfig for "fitImage" kernel
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 07:20:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3d14378-3a29-45f3-bea4-9a8ad0396a9f@topic.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a28c790acf8e06fd67761a6867dfe5fe412d8b3.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

On 24-05-2024 12:22, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 15:43 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>> I was about to comment on the v2 that this should rather be a class :)
>> Do we have some information on how/why this is the direction the project
>> should move towards? What are the pitfalls we're trying to avoid, or
>> benefits we want to gain? Or is this just some better/best practice we
>> want to go for?
> There was a post from me a while back complaining about repeatedly
> splitting class files into smaller less manageable ones so that people
> could access some variables without the task/function side effects.
>
> I have a belief that more configuration files would help this kind of
> problem and make classes more specific/focused and usable.
>
Okay, so what is now the way forward? v1 or v2?


-- 
Mike Looijmans
System Expert

TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands

T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijmans@topic.nl
W: www.topic.nl





  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-28  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1b153bce-a66a-45ee-a5c6-963ea6fb1c82.949ef384-8293-46b8-903f-40a477c056ae.cc544a93-e646-4932-8496-82717a21cde8@emailsignatures365.codetwo.com>
2024-05-21 13:57 ` [PATCH] meta: uboot-config: Fix broken menuconfig for "fitImage" kernel Mike Looijmans
2024-05-21 14:51   ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2024-05-22  5:28     ` mike.looijmans
2024-05-22  5:39       ` Richard Purdie
2024-05-22  6:43         ` mike.looijmans
2024-05-23 13:43           ` Quentin Schulz
2024-05-24 10:03             ` mike.looijmans
2024-05-24 10:22             ` Richard Purdie
2024-05-28  5:20               ` mike.looijmans [this message]
2024-05-28 10:01                 ` Quentin Schulz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3d14378-3a29-45f3-bea4-9a8ad0396a9f@topic.nl \
    --to=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox