* [PATCHv3 0/2] Multi-threaded RPM support
@ 2017-06-09 11:13 Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] package_rpm.bbclass: use multithreaded xz compression Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2017-06-09 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Changes in version 3: fix up indentation inconsistencies, fix a nasty variable name typo
Changes in version 2: use openmp for multi-processing instead of NSPR library, as
requested by upstream. Add a link to the upstream submission to patches.
These two patches add multi-threaded features to RPM to speed up the do_package_write_rpm task.
Specifically:
1) Multi-threaded xz compressor is used instead of default single-threaded gz. This has the most
dramatic effect when a recipe produces a smaller number of large-sized packages.
2) Packages creation is run in multiple threads via thread pools. This is most beneficial when
a recipe produces a large amount of small packages.
Some not very scientific benchmarks for time and .rpm sizes
(time is measured for do_package_write_rpm tasks only):
webkitgtk
before: 9m12s 1550M
after: 1m40s 858M
glibc-locale
before: 2m52s 125M
after: 30s 56M
glibc
before: 46s 54M
after: 13s 38M
perl
before: 1m09s 63M
after: 45s 42M
python3
before: 30s 38M
after: 18s 24M
The following changes since commit 576821ea0a7558b626ccc87e9ae0e9ee40864956:
bitbake: bitbake-layers: check layer dependencies before adding (2017-06-06 19:52:51 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib akanavin/parallel-rpm
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=akanavin/parallel-rpm
Alexander Kanavin (2):
package_rpm.bbclass: use multithreaded xz compression
rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools
meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 2 +
...y-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch | 84 ++++++++
...-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch | 126 ++++++++++++
...c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++
...c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb | 4 +
6 files changed, 639 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0001-Split-binary-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0002-Run-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0003-rpmstrpool.c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0004-build-pack.c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv3 1/2] package_rpm.bbclass: use multithreaded xz compression
2017-06-09 11:13 [PATCHv3 0/2] Multi-threaded RPM support Alexander Kanavin
@ 2017-06-09 11:13 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2017-06-09 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
RPM's default is single-threaded gz; the change greatly helps with
both buildtimes (when there is a small number of large-sized packages)
and disk space taken by resulting rpms.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
---
meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
index a844c4d4360..dc241975c3b 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
@@ -644,6 +644,8 @@ python do_package_rpm () {
cmd = cmd + " --define '_build_name_fmt %%{NAME}-%%{VERSION}-%%{RELEASE}.%%{ARCH}.rpm'"
cmd = cmd + " --define '_use_internal_dependency_generator 0'"
cmd = cmd + " --define '_binaries_in_noarch_packages_terminate_build 0'"
+ cmd = cmd + " --define '_binary_payload w6T.xzdio'"
+ cmd = cmd + " --define '_source_payload w6T.xzdio'"
if perfiledeps:
cmd = cmd + " --define '__find_requires " + outdepends + "'"
cmd = cmd + " --define '__find_provides " + outprovides + "'"
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools
2017-06-09 11:13 [PATCHv3 0/2] Multi-threaded RPM support Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] package_rpm.bbclass: use multithreaded xz compression Alexander Kanavin
@ 2017-06-09 11:13 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 16:32 ` Burton, Ross
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2017-06-09 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
This greatly reduces build times when there is a large amount of small
rpm packages to produce. The patches are rather invasive,
and so will be submitted upstream.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
---
...y-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch | 84 ++++++++
...-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch | 126 ++++++++++++
...c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++
...c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb | 4 +
5 files changed, 637 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0001-Split-binary-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0002-Run-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0003-rpmstrpool.c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0004-build-pack.c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0001-Split-binary-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0001-Split-binary-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e44f0b7fc9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0001-Split-binary-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+From 721a660a507d6d062e7aecafad886c643970a5d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 18:15:27 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Split binary package building into a separate function
+
+So that it can be run as a thread pool task.
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/226]
+Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+
+---
+ build/pack.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
+ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/build/pack.c b/build/pack.c
+index 518f4e92a..ccfd614cc 100644
+--- a/build/pack.c
++++ b/build/pack.c
+@@ -546,18 +546,13 @@ static rpmRC checkPackages(char *pkgcheck)
+ return RPMRC_OK;
+ }
+
+-rpmRC packageBinaries(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
++static rpmRC packageBinary(rpmSpec spec, Package pkg, const char *cookie, int cheating, char** filename)
+ {
+- rpmRC rc;
+- const char *errorString;
+- Package pkg;
+- char *pkglist = NULL;
+-
+- for (pkg = spec->packages; pkg != NULL; pkg = pkg->next) {
+- char *fn;
++ const char *errorString;
++ rpmRC rc = RPMRC_OK;
+
+ if (pkg->fileList == NULL)
+- continue;
++ return rc;
+
+ if ((rc = processScriptFiles(spec, pkg)))
+ return rc;
+@@ -587,7 +582,7 @@ rpmRC packageBinaries(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
+ headerGetString(pkg->header, RPMTAG_NAME), errorString);
+ return RPMRC_FAIL;
+ }
+- fn = rpmGetPath("%{_rpmdir}/", binRpm, NULL);
++ *filename = rpmGetPath("%{_rpmdir}/", binRpm, NULL);
+ if ((binDir = strchr(binRpm, '/')) != NULL) {
+ struct stat st;
+ char *dn;
+@@ -609,14 +604,28 @@ rpmRC packageBinaries(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
+ free(binRpm);
+ }
+
+- rc = writeRPM(pkg, NULL, fn, NULL);
++ rc = writeRPM(pkg, NULL, *filename, NULL);
+ if (rc == RPMRC_OK) {
+ /* Do check each written package if enabled */
+- char *pkgcheck = rpmExpand("%{?_build_pkgcheck} ", fn, NULL);
++ char *pkgcheck = rpmExpand("%{?_build_pkgcheck} ", *filename, NULL);
+ if (pkgcheck[0] != ' ') {
+ rc = checkPackages(pkgcheck);
+ }
+ free(pkgcheck);
++ }
++ return rc;
++}
++
++rpmRC packageBinaries(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
++{
++ rpmRC rc;
++ Package pkg;
++ char *pkglist = NULL;
++
++ for (pkg = spec->packages; pkg != NULL; pkg = pkg->next) {
++ char *fn = NULL;
++ rc = packageBinary(spec, pkg, cookie, cheating, &fn);
++ if (rc == RPMRC_OK) {
+ rstrcat(&pkglist, fn);
+ rstrcat(&pkglist, " ");
+ }
+--
+2.11.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0002-Run-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0002-Run-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b95fcf64d29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0002-Run-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+From 607b544b2363bad797333601987678325aa3e05a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 19:30:20 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Run binary package creation via thread pools.
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/226]
+Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+
+---
+ build/pack.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
+ configure.ac | 3 +++
+ 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/build/pack.c b/build/pack.c
+index ccfd614cc..332d84e4f 100644
+--- a/build/pack.c
++++ b/build/pack.c
+@@ -616,25 +616,77 @@ static rpmRC packageBinary(rpmSpec spec, Package pkg, const char *cookie, int ch
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+-rpmRC packageBinaries(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
++struct binaryPackageTaskData
+ {
+- rpmRC rc;
+ Package pkg;
++ char *filename;
++ rpmRC result;
++ struct binaryPackageTaskData *next;
++};
++
++static struct binaryPackageTaskData* runBinaryPackageTasks(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
++{
++ struct binaryPackageTaskData *tasks = NULL;
++ struct binaryPackageTaskData *task = NULL;
++ struct binaryPackageTaskData *prev = NULL;
++
++ for (Package pkg = spec->packages; pkg != NULL; pkg = pkg->next) {
++ task = rcalloc(1, sizeof(*task));
++ task->pkg = pkg;
++ if (pkg == spec->packages) {
++ // the first package needs to be processed ahead of others, as they copy
++ // changelog data from it, and so otherwise data races would happen
++ task->result = packageBinary(spec, pkg, cookie, cheating, &(task->filename));
++ rpmlog(RPMLOG_NOTICE, _("Finished binary package job, result %d, filename %s\n"), task->result, task->filename);
++ tasks = task;
++ }
++ if (prev != NULL) {
++ prev->next = task;
++ }
++ prev = task;
++ }
++
++ #pragma omp parallel
++ #pragma omp single
++ for (task = tasks; task != NULL; task = task->next) {
++ if (task != tasks)
++ #pragma omp task
++ {
++ task->result = packageBinary(spec, task->pkg, cookie, cheating, &(task->filename));
++ rpmlog(RPMLOG_NOTICE, _("Finished binary package job, result %d, filename %s\n"), task->result, task->filename);
++ }
++ }
++
++ return tasks;
++}
++
++static void freeBinaryPackageTasks(struct binaryPackageTaskData* tasks)
++{
++ while (tasks != NULL) {
++ struct binaryPackageTaskData* next = tasks->next;
++ rfree(tasks->filename);
++ rfree(tasks);
++ tasks = next;
++ }
++}
++
++rpmRC packageBinaries(rpmSpec spec, const char *cookie, int cheating)
++{
+ char *pkglist = NULL;
+
+- for (pkg = spec->packages; pkg != NULL; pkg = pkg->next) {
+- char *fn = NULL;
+- rc = packageBinary(spec, pkg, cookie, cheating, &fn);
+- if (rc == RPMRC_OK) {
+- rstrcat(&pkglist, fn);
+- rstrcat(&pkglist, " ");
+- }
+- free(fn);
+- if (rc != RPMRC_OK) {
+- pkglist = _free(pkglist);
+- return rc;
+- }
++ struct binaryPackageTaskData *tasks = runBinaryPackageTasks(spec, cookie, cheating);
++
++ for (struct binaryPackageTaskData *task = tasks; task != NULL; task = task->next) {
++ if (task->result == RPMRC_OK) {
++ rstrcat(&pkglist, task->filename);
++ rstrcat(&pkglist, " ");
++ } else {
++ _free(pkglist);
++ freeBinaryPackageTasks(tasks);
++ return RPMRC_FAIL;
++ }
+ }
++ freeBinaryPackageTasks(tasks);
+
+ /* Now check the package set if enabled */
+ if (pkglist != NULL) {
+diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
+index a506ec819..59fa0acaf 100644
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ AC_DISABLE_STATIC
+
+ PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG
+
++AC_OPENMP
++RPMCFLAGS="$OPENMP_CFLAGS $RPMCFLAGS"
++
+ dnl Checks for programs.
+ AC_PROG_CXX
+ AC_PROG_AWK
+--
+2.11.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0003-rpmstrpool.c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0003-rpmstrpool.c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c348ae5330e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0003-rpmstrpool.c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+From c80892f17e44331206c8318d53b63bb6a99554d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:58:30 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rpmstrpool.c: make operations over string pools
+ thread-safe
+
+Otherwise multithreaded rpm building explodes in various ways due
+to data races.
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/226]
+Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+
+---
+ rpmio/rpmstrpool.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
+ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/rpmio/rpmstrpool.c b/rpmio/rpmstrpool.c
+index 30a57eb10..58ba95a02 100644
+--- a/rpmio/rpmstrpool.c
++++ b/rpmio/rpmstrpool.c
+@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static poolHash poolHashCreate(int numBuckets)
+ return ht;
+ }
+
++static const char * rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(rpmstrPool pool, rpmsid sid);
++
+ static void poolHashResize(rpmstrPool pool, int numBuckets)
+ {
+ poolHash ht = pool->hash;
+@@ -120,7 +122,7 @@ static void poolHashResize(rpmstrPool pool, int numBuckets)
+
+ for (int i=0; i<ht->numBuckets; i++) {
+ if (!ht->buckets[i].keyid) continue;
+- unsigned int keyHash = rstrhash(rpmstrPoolStr(pool, ht->buckets[i].keyid));
++ unsigned int keyHash = rstrhash(rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(pool, ht->buckets[i].keyid));
+ for (unsigned int j=0;;j++) {
+ unsigned int hash = hashbucket(keyHash, j) % numBuckets;
+ if (!buckets[hash].keyid) {
+@@ -149,7 +151,7 @@ static void poolHashAddHEntry(rpmstrPool pool, const char * key, unsigned int ke
+ ht->buckets[hash].keyid = keyid;
+ ht->keyCount++;
+ break;
+- } else if (!strcmp(rpmstrPoolStr(pool, ht->buckets[hash].keyid), key)) {
++ } else if (!strcmp(rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(pool, ht->buckets[hash].keyid), key)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+@@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ static void poolHashPrintStats(rpmstrPool pool)
+ int maxcollisions = 0;
+
+ for (i=0; i<ht->numBuckets; i++) {
+- unsigned int keyHash = rstrhash(rpmstrPoolStr(pool, ht->buckets[i].keyid));
++ unsigned int keyHash = rstrhash(rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(pool, ht->buckets[i].keyid));
+ for (unsigned int j=0;;j++) {
+ unsigned int hash = hashbucket(keyHash, i) % ht->numBuckets;
+ if (hash==i) {
+@@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ static void rpmstrPoolRehash(rpmstrPool pool)
+
+ pool->hash = poolHashCreate(sizehint);
+ for (int i = 1; i <= pool->offs_size; i++)
+- poolHashAddEntry(pool, rpmstrPoolStr(pool, i), i);
++ poolHashAddEntry(pool, rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(pool, i), i);
+ }
+
+ rpmstrPool rpmstrPoolCreate(void)
+@@ -245,6 +247,8 @@ rpmstrPool rpmstrPoolCreate(void)
+
+ rpmstrPool rpmstrPoolFree(rpmstrPool pool)
+ {
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (pool) {
+ if (pool->nrefs > 1) {
+ pool->nrefs--;
+@@ -260,18 +264,24 @@ rpmstrPool rpmstrPoolFree(rpmstrPool pool)
+ free(pool);
+ }
+ }
++ }
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ rpmstrPool rpmstrPoolLink(rpmstrPool pool)
+ {
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (pool)
+ pool->nrefs++;
++ }
+ return pool;
+ }
+
+ void rpmstrPoolFreeze(rpmstrPool pool, int keephash)
+ {
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (pool && !pool->frozen) {
+ if (!keephash) {
+ pool->hash = poolHashFree(pool->hash);
+@@ -281,16 +291,20 @@ void rpmstrPoolFreeze(rpmstrPool pool, int keephash)
+ pool->offs_alloced * sizeof(*pool->offs));
+ pool->frozen = 1;
+ }
++ }
+ }
+
+ void rpmstrPoolUnfreeze(rpmstrPool pool)
+ {
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (pool) {
+ if (pool->hash == NULL) {
+ rpmstrPoolRehash(pool);
+ }
+ pool->frozen = 0;
+ }
++ }
+ }
+
+ static rpmsid rpmstrPoolPut(rpmstrPool pool, const char *s, size_t slen, unsigned int hash)
+@@ -350,7 +364,7 @@ static rpmsid rpmstrPoolGet(rpmstrPool pool, const char * key, size_t keylen,
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+- s = rpmstrPoolStr(pool, ht->buckets[hash].keyid);
++ s = rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(pool, ht->buckets[hash].keyid);
+ /* pool string could be longer than keylen, require exact matche */
+ if (strncmp(s, key, keylen) == 0 && s[keylen] == '\0')
+ return ht->buckets[hash].keyid;
+@@ -373,27 +387,31 @@ static inline rpmsid strn2id(rpmstrPool pool, const char *s, size_t slen,
+ rpmsid rpmstrPoolIdn(rpmstrPool pool, const char *s, size_t slen, int create)
+ {
+ rpmsid sid = 0;
+-
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (s != NULL) {
+ unsigned int hash = rstrnhash(s, slen);
+ sid = strn2id(pool, s, slen, hash, create);
+ }
++ }
+ return sid;
+ }
+
+ rpmsid rpmstrPoolId(rpmstrPool pool, const char *s, int create)
+ {
+ rpmsid sid = 0;
+-
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (s != NULL) {
+ size_t slen;
+ unsigned int hash = rstrlenhash(s, &slen);
+ sid = strn2id(pool, s, slen, hash, create);
+ }
++ }
+ return sid;
+ }
+
+-const char * rpmstrPoolStr(rpmstrPool pool, rpmsid sid)
++static const char * rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(rpmstrPool pool, rpmsid sid)
+ {
+ const char *s = NULL;
+ if (pool && sid > 0 && sid <= pool->offs_size)
+@@ -401,12 +419,25 @@ const char * rpmstrPoolStr(rpmstrPool pool, rpmsid sid)
+ return s;
+ }
+
++const char * rpmstrPoolStr(rpmstrPool pool, rpmsid sid)
++{
++ const char *s = NULL;
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
++ s = rpmstrPoolStrNoLock(pool, sid);
++ }
++ return s;
++}
++
+ size_t rpmstrPoolStrlen(rpmstrPool pool, rpmsid sid)
+ {
+ size_t slen = 0;
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
+ if (pool && sid > 0 && sid <= pool->offs_size) {
+ slen = strlen(pool->offs[sid]);
+ }
++ }
+ return slen;
+ }
+
+@@ -421,5 +452,12 @@ int rpmstrPoolStreq(rpmstrPool poolA, rpmsid sidA,
+
+ rpmsid rpmstrPoolNumStr(rpmstrPool pool)
+ {
+- return (pool != NULL) ? pool->offs_size : 0;
++ rpmsid id = 0;
++ #pragma omp critical(rpmstrpool)
++ {
++ if (pool) {
++ id = pool->offs_size;
++ }
++ }
++ return id;
+ }
+--
+2.11.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0004-build-pack.c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0004-build-pack.c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1fca629195b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0004-build-pack.c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+From 1268fb726c2419cb623371454bae653c4078a136 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:08:09 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 4/4] build/pack.c: remove static local variables from
+ buildHost() and getBuildTime()
+
+Their use is causing difficult to diagnoze data races when building multiple
+packages in parallel, and is a bad idea in general, as it also makes it more
+difficult to reason about code.
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/226]
+Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+
+---
+ build/pack.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
+ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/build/pack.c b/build/pack.c
+index 332d84e4f..d6837ef13 100644
+--- a/build/pack.c
++++ b/build/pack.c
+@@ -151,54 +151,47 @@ exit:
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+-static rpm_time_t * getBuildTime(void)
++static rpm_time_t getBuildTime(void)
+ {
+- static rpm_time_t buildTime[1];
++ rpm_time_t buildTime = 0;
+ char *srcdate;
+ time_t epoch;
+ char *endptr;
+
+- if (buildTime[0] == 0) {
+- srcdate = getenv("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH");
+- if (srcdate) {
+- errno = 0;
+- epoch = strtol(srcdate, &endptr, 10);
+- if (srcdate == endptr || *endptr || errno != 0)
+- rpmlog(RPMLOG_ERR, _("unable to parse SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH\n"));
+- else
+- buildTime[0] = (int32_t) epoch;
+- } else
+- buildTime[0] = (int32_t) time(NULL);
+- }
++ srcdate = getenv("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH");
++ if (srcdate) {
++ errno = 0;
++ epoch = strtol(srcdate, &endptr, 10);
++ if (srcdate == endptr || *endptr || errno != 0)
++ rpmlog(RPMLOG_ERR, _("unable to parse SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH\n"));
++ else
++ buildTime = (int32_t) epoch;
++ } else
++ buildTime = (int32_t) time(NULL);
+
+ return buildTime;
+ }
+
+-static const char * buildHost(void)
++static char * buildHost(void)
+ {
+- static char hostname[1024];
+- static int oneshot = 0;
++ char* hostname;
+ struct hostent *hbn;
+ char *bhMacro;
+
+- if (! oneshot) {
+- bhMacro = rpmExpand("%{?_buildhost}", NULL);
+- if (strcmp(bhMacro, "") != 0 && strlen(bhMacro) < 1024) {
+- strcpy(hostname, bhMacro);
+- } else {
+- if (strcmp(bhMacro, "") != 0)
+- rpmlog(RPMLOG_WARNING, _("The _buildhost macro is too long\n"));
+- (void) gethostname(hostname, sizeof(hostname));
+- hbn = gethostbyname(hostname);
+- if (hbn)
+- strcpy(hostname, hbn->h_name);
+- else
+- rpmlog(RPMLOG_WARNING,
+- _("Could not canonicalize hostname: %s\n"), hostname);
+- }
+- free(bhMacro);
+- oneshot = 1;
+- }
++ bhMacro = rpmExpand("%{?_buildhost}", NULL);
++ if (strcmp(bhMacro, "") != 0) {
++ rasprintf(&hostname, "%s", bhMacro);
++ } else {
++ hostname = rcalloc(1024, sizeof(*hostname));
++ (void) gethostname(hostname, 1024);
++ hbn = gethostbyname(hostname);
++ if (hbn)
++ strcpy(hostname, hbn->h_name);
++ else
++ rpmlog(RPMLOG_WARNING,
++ _("Could not canonicalize hostname: %s\n"), hostname);
++ }
++ free(bhMacro);
+ return(hostname);
+ }
+
+@@ -308,7 +301,8 @@ static int haveRichDep(Package pkg)
+ }
+
+ static rpmRC writeRPM(Package pkg, unsigned char ** pkgidp,
+- const char *fileName, char **cookie)
++ const char *fileName, char **cookie,
++ rpm_time_t buildTime, const char* buildHost)
+ {
+ FD_t fd = NULL;
+ char * rpmio_flags = NULL;
+@@ -397,7 +391,7 @@ static rpmRC writeRPM(Package pkg, unsigned char ** pkgidp,
+
+ /* Create and add the cookie */
+ if (cookie) {
+- rasprintf(cookie, "%s %d", buildHost(), (int) (*getBuildTime()));
++ rasprintf(cookie, "%s %d", buildHost, buildTime);
+ headerPutString(pkg->header, RPMTAG_COOKIE, *cookie);
+ }
+
+@@ -546,7 +540,7 @@ static rpmRC checkPackages(char *pkgcheck)
+ return RPMRC_OK;
+ }
+
+-static rpmRC packageBinary(rpmSpec spec, Package pkg, const char *cookie, int cheating, char** filename)
++static rpmRC packageBinary(rpmSpec spec, Package pkg, const char *cookie, int cheating, char** filename, rpm_time_t buildTime, const char* buildHost)
+ {
+ const char *errorString;
+ rpmRC rc = RPMRC_OK;
+@@ -565,8 +559,8 @@ static rpmRC packageBinary(rpmSpec spec, Package pkg, const char *cookie, int ch
+ headerCopyTags(spec->packages->header, pkg->header, copyTags);
+
+ headerPutString(pkg->header, RPMTAG_RPMVERSION, VERSION);
+- headerPutString(pkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDHOST, buildHost());
+- headerPutUint32(pkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDTIME, getBuildTime(), 1);
++ headerPutString(pkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDHOST, buildHost);
++ headerPutUint32(pkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDTIME, &buildTime, 1);
+
+ if (spec->sourcePkgId != NULL) {
+ headerPutBin(pkg->header, RPMTAG_SOURCEPKGID, spec->sourcePkgId,16);
+@@ -604,7 +598,7 @@ static rpmRC packageBinary(rpmSpec spec, Package pkg, const char *cookie, int ch
+ free(binRpm);
+ }
+
+- rc = writeRPM(pkg, NULL, *filename, NULL);
++ rc = writeRPM(pkg, NULL, *filename, NULL, buildTime, buildHost);
+ if (rc == RPMRC_OK) {
+ /* Do check each written package if enabled */
+ char *pkgcheck = rpmExpand("%{?_build_pkgcheck} ", *filename, NULL);
+@@ -629,6 +623,8 @@ static struct binaryPackageTaskData* runBinaryPackageTasks(rpmSpec spec, const c
+ struct binaryPackageTaskData *tasks = NULL;
+ struct binaryPackageTaskData *task = NULL;
+ struct binaryPackageTaskData *prev = NULL;
++ rpm_time_t buildTime = getBuildTime();
++ char *host = buildHost();
+
+ for (Package pkg = spec->packages; pkg != NULL; pkg = pkg->next) {
+ task = rcalloc(1, sizeof(*task));
+@@ -636,7 +632,7 @@ static struct binaryPackageTaskData* runBinaryPackageTasks(rpmSpec spec, const c
+ if (pkg == spec->packages) {
+ // the first package needs to be processed ahead of others, as they copy
+ // changelog data from it, and so otherwise data races would happen
+- task->result = packageBinary(spec, pkg, cookie, cheating, &(task->filename));
++ task->result = packageBinary(spec, pkg, cookie, cheating, &(task->filename), buildTime, host);
+ rpmlog(RPMLOG_NOTICE, _("Finished binary package job, result %d, filename %s\n"), task->result, task->filename);
+ tasks = task;
+ }
+@@ -652,11 +648,12 @@ static struct binaryPackageTaskData* runBinaryPackageTasks(rpmSpec spec, const c
+ if (task != tasks)
+ #pragma omp task
+ {
+- task->result = packageBinary(spec, task->pkg, cookie, cheating, &(task->filename));
++ task->result = packageBinary(spec, task->pkg, cookie, cheating, &(task->filename), buildTime, host);
+ rpmlog(RPMLOG_NOTICE, _("Finished binary package job, result %d, filename %s\n"), task->result, task->filename);
+ }
+ }
+
++ free(host);
+ return tasks;
+ }
+
+@@ -707,16 +704,18 @@ rpmRC packageSources(rpmSpec spec, char **cookie)
+ rpmRC rc;
+
+ /* Add some cruft */
++ rpm_time_t buildTime = getBuildTime();
++ char* host = buildHost();
+ headerPutString(sourcePkg->header, RPMTAG_RPMVERSION, VERSION);
+- headerPutString(sourcePkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDHOST, buildHost());
+- headerPutUint32(sourcePkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDTIME, getBuildTime(), 1);
++ headerPutString(sourcePkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDHOST, host);
++ headerPutUint32(sourcePkg->header, RPMTAG_BUILDTIME, &buildTime, 1);
+
+ /* XXX this should be %_srpmdir */
+ { char *fn = rpmGetPath("%{_srcrpmdir}/", spec->sourceRpmName,NULL);
+ char *pkgcheck = rpmExpand("%{?_build_pkgcheck_srpm} ", fn, NULL);
+
+ spec->sourcePkgId = NULL;
+- rc = writeRPM(sourcePkg, &spec->sourcePkgId, fn, cookie);
++ rc = writeRPM(sourcePkg, &spec->sourcePkgId, fn, cookie, buildTime, host);
+
+ /* Do check SRPM package if enabled */
+ if (rc == RPMRC_OK && pkgcheck[0] != ' ') {
+@@ -726,5 +725,6 @@ rpmRC packageSources(rpmSpec spec, char **cookie)
+ free(pkgcheck);
+ free(fn);
+ }
++ free(host);
+ return rc;
+ }
+--
+2.11.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb
index 2310ee6b09e..b95b4719c19 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ SRC_URI = "git://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm \
file://0001-Fix-build-with-musl-C-library.patch \
file://0001-Add-a-color-setting-for-mips64_n32-binaries.patch \
file://0001-Add-PYTHON_ABI-when-searching-for-python-libraries.patch \
+ file://0001-Split-binary-package-building-into-a-separate-functi.patch \
+ file://0002-Run-binary-package-creation-via-thread-pools.patch \
+ file://0003-rpmstrpool.c-make-operations-over-string-pools-threa.patch \
+ file://0004-build-pack.c-remove-static-local-variables-from-buil.patch \
"
PV = "4.13.90+git${SRCPV}"
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools Alexander Kanavin
@ 2017-06-09 16:32 ` Burton, Ross
2017-06-09 20:58 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-06-09 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Kanavin; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 336 bytes --]
On 9 June 2017 at 12:13, Alexander Kanavin <
alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> This greatly reduces build times when there is a large amount of small
> rpm packages to produce. The patches are rather invasive,
> and so will be submitted upstream.
>
Sorry but I broke this in the same way as I did before...
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 747 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools
2017-06-09 16:32 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2017-06-09 20:58 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2017-06-09 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: OE-core
On 06/09/2017 07:32 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 9 June 2017 at 12:13, Alexander Kanavin
> <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com
> <mailto:alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>
> This greatly reduces build times when there is a large amount of small
> rpm packages to produce. The patches are rather invasive,
> and so will be submitted upstream.
>
>
> Sorry but I broke this in the same way as I did before...
Needless to say, this worked flawlessly here, many times over. It seems
that failures might be specific to gcc 4.x (I have 6.x here), so I'll
try to get a failure using that. The nasty bit about openmp is that
#pragma omp unsupported_directive_from_latest_standard
will trigger nothing with compilers that are too old to support it.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-09 20:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-09 11:13 [PATCHv3 0/2] Multi-threaded RPM support Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] package_rpm.bbclass: use multithreaded xz compression Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] rpm: run binary package generation via thread pools Alexander Kanavin
2017-06-09 16:32 ` Burton, Ross
2017-06-09 20:58 ` Alexander Kanavin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox