* [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm
@ 2020-02-12 5:19 Khem Raj
2020-02-12 7:11 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2020-02-12 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb | 8 ++++++++
meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
index f38167f1ad..9e6d5741af 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
@@ -84,3 +84,11 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "dnf-makecache.service dnf-makecache.timer \
dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
"
SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
+
+python () {
+ pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
+ pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
+ pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
+ if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
+ raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
+}
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
index 882c435b32..5c9326ca64 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
@@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = " -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
+python () {
+ pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
+ pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
+ pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
+ if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
+ raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
+}
--
2.25.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm
2020-02-12 5:19 [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm Khem Raj
@ 2020-02-12 7:11 ` Alexander Kanavin
2020-02-12 15:11 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2020-02-12 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2138 bytes --]
Please let’s try to avoid anonymous python. What problem does this solve?
If package_rpm is not enabled, then there should not be a dependency chain
that builds these anyway.
Alex
On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 6.20, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb | 8 ++++++++
> meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> index f38167f1ad..9e6d5741af 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> @@ -84,3 +84,11 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "dnf-makecache.service
> dnf-makecache.timer \
> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service
> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
> "
> SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
> +
> +python () {
> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in libsolv"
> % (pkgn, pkgv))
> +}
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> index 882c435b32..5c9326ca64 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> @@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = " -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
>
> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
>
> +python () {
> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in libsolv"
> % (pkgn, pkgv))
> +}
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3667 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm
2020-02-12 7:11 ` Alexander Kanavin
@ 2020-02-12 15:11 ` Khem Raj
2020-02-12 15:30 ` Alexander Kanavin
2020-02-12 16:32 ` Martin Jansa
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2020-02-12 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Kanavin; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alexander Kanavin
<alex.kanavin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please let’s try to avoid anonymous python. What problem does this solve? If package_rpm is not enabled, then there should not be a dependency chain that builds these anyway.
for non rpm backend opkg, rpm is pulled in which is not desired
because opkg depends on libsolv
and libsolv by default depends on rpm which I sent another patch to
decouple, This caused opkg images to fail tests because testing infra
found rpm in the image and ran tests for it which obviously would
fail.
libsolv does have rpm support as packageconfig but when that
is disabled then libdnf does not build anymore since it expects rpmdb
support in libsolv.
so when we do world builds with opkg as package management then dnf
and libdbf starts to fail
due to their RPM needs.
IF there was an override to identity packaging backends then we could
have used that
If you have better suggestions to avoid anon python here, I am all ears.
>
> Alex
>
> On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 6.20, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb | 8 ++++++++
>> meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
>> index f38167f1ad..9e6d5741af 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
>> @@ -84,3 +84,11 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "dnf-makecache.service dnf-makecache.timer \
>> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
>> "
>> SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
>> +
>> +python () {
>> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
>> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
>> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
>> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
>> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
>> +}
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
>> index 882c435b32..5c9326ca64 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
>> @@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = " -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
>>
>> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
>>
>> +python () {
>> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
>> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
>> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
>> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
>> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.25.0
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm
2020-02-12 15:11 ` Khem Raj
@ 2020-02-12 15:30 ` Alexander Kanavin
2020-02-12 16:32 ` Martin Jansa
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2020-02-12 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3462 bytes --]
Maybe we can package rpm better so that the binaries and the libraries go
into separate packages? Then libsolv would only pull in the rpm libraries
and rpm tests would be skipped?
Alex
On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 16.12, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alexander Kanavin
> <alex.kanavin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please let’s try to avoid anonymous python. What problem does this
> solve? If package_rpm is not enabled, then there should not be a dependency
> chain that builds these anyway.
>
> for non rpm backend opkg, rpm is pulled in which is not desired
> because opkg depends on libsolv
> and libsolv by default depends on rpm which I sent another patch to
> decouple, This caused opkg images to fail tests because testing infra
> found rpm in the image and ran tests for it which obviously would
> fail.
>
> libsolv does have rpm support as packageconfig but when that
> is disabled then libdnf does not build anymore since it expects rpmdb
> support in libsolv.
>
> so when we do world builds with opkg as package management then dnf
> and libdbf starts to fail
> due to their RPM needs.
>
> IF there was an override to identity packaging backends then we could
> have used that
>
> If you have better suggestions to avoid anon python here, I am all ears.
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 6.20, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb | 8 ++++++++
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb | 7 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> index f38167f1ad..9e6d5741af 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> @@ -84,3 +84,11 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "dnf-makecache.service
> dnf-makecache.timer \
> >> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service
> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
> >> "
> >> SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
> >> +
> >> +python () {
> >> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> >> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> >> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> >> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in
> libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> index 882c435b32..5c9326ca64 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> @@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = "
> -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
> >>
> >> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
> >>
> >> +python () {
> >> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> >> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> >> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> >> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in
> libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
> >> +}
> >> --
> >> 2.25.0
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5477 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm
2020-02-12 15:11 ` Khem Raj
2020-02-12 15:30 ` Alexander Kanavin
@ 2020-02-12 16:32 ` Martin Jansa
2020-02-12 17:18 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Jansa @ 2020-02-12 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3704 bytes --]
Will this work for you without anonymous python? I think it should.
PNBLACKLIST[dnf] ?= "${@oe.utils.conditional('PACKAGE_CLASSES',
'package_rpm', '' 'does not build correctly without package_rpm in
PACKAGE_CLASSES', d)}"
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:12 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alexander Kanavin
> <alex.kanavin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please let’s try to avoid anonymous python. What problem does this
> solve? If package_rpm is not enabled, then there should not be a dependency
> chain that builds these anyway.
>
> for non rpm backend opkg, rpm is pulled in which is not desired
> because opkg depends on libsolv
> and libsolv by default depends on rpm which I sent another patch to
> decouple, This caused opkg images to fail tests because testing infra
> found rpm in the image and ran tests for it which obviously would
> fail.
>
> libsolv does have rpm support as packageconfig but when that
> is disabled then libdnf does not build anymore since it expects rpmdb
> support in libsolv.
>
> so when we do world builds with opkg as package management then dnf
> and libdbf starts to fail
> due to their RPM needs.
>
> IF there was an override to identity packaging backends then we could
> have used that
>
> If you have better suggestions to avoid anon python here, I am all ears.
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 6.20, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb | 8 ++++++++
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb | 7 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> index f38167f1ad..9e6d5741af 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> @@ -84,3 +84,11 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "dnf-makecache.service
> dnf-makecache.timer \
> >> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service
> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
> >> "
> >> SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
> >> +
> >> +python () {
> >> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> >> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> >> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> >> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in
> libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> index 882c435b32..5c9326ca64 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> @@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = "
> -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
> >>
> >> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
> >>
> >> +python () {
> >> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> >> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> >> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> >> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support in
> libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
> >> +}
> >> --
> >> 2.25.0
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5940 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm
2020-02-12 16:32 ` Martin Jansa
@ 2020-02-12 17:18 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2020-02-12 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Jansa; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 2/12/20 8:32 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Will this work for you without anonymous python? I think it should.
>
> PNBLACKLIST[dnf] ?= "${@oe.utils.conditional('PACKAGE_CLASSES',
> 'package_rpm', '' 'does not build correctly without package_rpm in
> PACKAGE_CLASSES', d)}"
I like this better than anon python. Perhaps worth it in a v2
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:12 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alexander Kanavin
> <alex.kanavin@gmail.com <mailto:alex.kanavin@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Please let’s try to avoid anonymous python. What problem does
> this solve? If package_rpm is not enabled, then there should not be
> a dependency chain that builds these anyway.
>
> for non rpm backend opkg, rpm is pulled in which is not desired
> because opkg depends on libsolv
> and libsolv by default depends on rpm which I sent another patch to
> decouple, This caused opkg images to fail tests because testing infra
> found rpm in the image and ran tests for it which obviously would
> fail.
>
> libsolv does have rpm support as packageconfig but when that
> is disabled then libdnf does not build anymore since it expects rpmdb
> support in libsolv.
>
> so when we do world builds with opkg as package management then dnf
> and libdbf starts to fail
> due to their RPM needs.
>
> IF there was an override to identity packaging backends then we could
> have used that
>
> If you have better suggestions to avoid anon python here, I am all ears.
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 6.20, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb <http://dnf_4.2.2.bb>
> | 8 ++++++++
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> <http://libdnf_0.28.1.bb> | 7 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> <http://dnf_4.2.2.bb> b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> <http://dnf_4.2.2.bb>
> >> index f38167f1ad..9e6d5741af 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb <http://dnf_4.2.2.bb>
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb <http://dnf_4.2.2.bb>
> >> @@ -84,3 +84,11 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} =
> "dnf-makecache.service dnf-makecache.timer \
> >> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service
> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
> >> "
> >> SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
> >> +
> >> +python () {
> >> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> >> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> >> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> >> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support
> in libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> <http://libdnf_0.28.1.bb>
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> <http://libdnf_0.28.1.bb>
> >> index 882c435b32..5c9326ca64 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> <http://libdnf_0.28.1.bb>
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> <http://libdnf_0.28.1.bb>
> >> @@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = "
> -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
> >>
> >> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
> >>
> >> +python () {
> >> + pkgb = d.getVar("PACKAGE_CLASSES")
> >> + pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
> >> + pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
> >> + if "package_rpm" not in pkgb:
> >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s Needs rpmdb support
> in libsolv" % (pkgn, pkgv))
> >> +}
> >> --
> >> 2.25.0
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-12 17:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-12 5:19 [PATCH] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm Khem Raj
2020-02-12 7:11 ` Alexander Kanavin
2020-02-12 15:11 ` Khem Raj
2020-02-12 15:30 ` Alexander Kanavin
2020-02-12 16:32 ` Martin Jansa
2020-02-12 17:18 ` Khem Raj
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox