From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: progress on OE organization issues
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 12:19:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241695142.16805.170.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f96d234e0904301843q27803491xe14c09bf75193fe7@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 21:43 -0400, Cliff Brake wrote:
> The eV stuff is a little less known, as about all I can do keep
> hassling those who started the process. I did note your thoughts
> about the eV, and have asked the http://www.softwarefreedom.org/ for
> any advice they might have. An organized way to handle funding does
> not seen super critical at this time with the nslu2-linux server
> offer, but something we should get in place.
Yes, agreed. Having a legal entity in place to handle funds would not
be at the top of my own list of organisational priorities for OE; as far
as I can tell, the amount of money that's actually flowing through the
project at the moment seems to be fairly negligible. I think there are
other issues which would have more of an impact on the day-to-day
operations of the project. My own personal "most wanted" thing would be
the establishment of some kind of technical steering committee to
provide a coherent policy direction, rather than having decisions with
global impact made on the hoof by individual developers.
The other thing that does strike me about the eV, though, is that it
does seem to be a rather cumbersome choice vehicle for solving the
problem at hand. From what I gather, the administrative requirements
for setting up a legal entity in Germany do seem to be significantly
more complicated and generally onerous than almost anywhere else I can
think of; witness I guess the fact that it's taken something over a year
to get to the point that we have with it.
Just as a point of comparison, a couple of weeks ago I found myself
needing to set up a new limited company here in the UK. It took me
about half an hour to fill in the form, cost me the equivalent of about
$40 in filing fees, and the company was all ready to go by the end of
the same day. (This is very roughly the equivalent of a German GmbH
rather than an eV, but still.) I've never been personally involved in
incorporating a company in the US but, from what I gather, it's more or
less equally straightforward to do so there.
I should say again though that I don't intend any of these remarks to be
a criticism of those who are setting up the eV, for whose efforts I have
great respect, nor am I in any way opposed to the eV itself. I do
wonder though whether all this administrative work is a good use of
scarce OE developer manpower.
> I have been pondering doing a series of polls to get feedback from the
> OE community and users. The first one should be coming out shortly.
> Perhaps we can use a mechanism like this for voting, etc eventually.
Yes, the one about hosting seems to have worked pretty well so far.
Thanks again for your work on that.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 12:44 progress on OE organization issues Cliff Brake
2009-04-30 14:26 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-01 1:43 ` Cliff Brake
2009-05-07 11:19 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2009-05-07 12:08 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 17:56 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-15 19:04 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 21:54 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-15 22:37 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-05-16 9:48 ` Richard Purdie
2009-05-16 10:55 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-16 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2009-05-16 12:02 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-16 12:54 ` Philip Balister
2009-06-02 21:18 ` Phil Blundell
2009-06-04 19:57 ` GNUtoo
2009-06-05 21:43 ` Cliff Brake
2009-06-06 6:46 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-09 9:21 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-09 9:53 ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-06-10 13:34 ` Cliff Brake
[not found] ` <d2b9ea600906092353o4fe9ea02vbc7df3b103b401c4@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-10 13:11 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-11 6:48 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-06-11 10:10 ` Phil Blundell
2009-06-11 12:35 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 19:48 ` Cliff Brake
2009-05-24 15:49 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-05-24 16:26 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-06 12:44 ` Cliff Brake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1241695142.16805.170.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox