From: "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" <mickey@vanille-media.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: progress on OE organization issues
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:11:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906101511.57613.mickey@vanille-media.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2b9ea600906092353o4fe9ea02vbc7df3b103b401c4@mail.gmail.com>
> As for the last bullet point, what is the status of membership for
> those of us without commit access? I seem to have seen mixed signals
> wether we are invited to be member of the e.V. Some messages
> indicates that only people with commit access are going to be
> accepted, while others (like mickey) request all interested in OE to
> join the e.V.
One of the major purposes of the e.V. is being able to raise funds to give
people a chance to improve the spots in OE where we are weak. The idea of a
self-chosen membership fee was to invite companies who have a certain benefit
from OE giving back in the form of tax-excemptible membership fees and
donations.
Most e.V. associations have the notion of 'active' and 'passive' members --
both which are equal stakeholders interested in supporting the association
through their contributions. I consider active members being the committers
contributing through code, docs, etc. and passive members being the ones who
rather want to contribute in monetary form.
By being a member, you have the rights to vote when it comes to decisions that
influence the future of the OE.
> Could someone put a small statement on Wiki on this?
We should, if the board agrees with that.
:M:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 12:44 progress on OE organization issues Cliff Brake
2009-04-30 14:26 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-01 1:43 ` Cliff Brake
2009-05-07 11:19 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-07 12:08 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 17:56 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-15 19:04 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 21:54 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-15 22:37 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-05-16 9:48 ` Richard Purdie
2009-05-16 10:55 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-16 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2009-05-16 12:02 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-16 12:54 ` Philip Balister
2009-06-02 21:18 ` Phil Blundell
2009-06-04 19:57 ` GNUtoo
2009-06-05 21:43 ` Cliff Brake
2009-06-06 6:46 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-09 9:21 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-06-09 9:53 ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-06-10 13:34 ` Cliff Brake
[not found] ` <d2b9ea600906092353o4fe9ea02vbc7df3b103b401c4@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-10 13:11 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [this message]
2009-06-11 6:48 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-06-11 10:10 ` Phil Blundell
2009-06-11 12:35 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-15 19:48 ` Cliff Brake
2009-05-24 15:49 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-05-24 16:26 ` Philip Balister
2009-05-06 12:44 ` Cliff Brake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906101511.57613.mickey@vanille-media.de \
--to=mickey@vanille-media.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox