From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH, V2 3/6] autotools.bbclass: Conditionally use autotools_prepackage_lamangler
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:46:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286415971-9960-4-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286415971-9960-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com>
* autotools_prepackage_lamangler is not needed with libtool 2.4+
* add --with-sysroot when using libtool 2.4+
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
classes/autotools.bbclass | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/autotools.bbclass b/classes/autotools.bbclass
index b2de2b1..ce4f66a 100644
--- a/classes/autotools.bbclass
+++ b/classes/autotools.bbclass
@@ -79,7 +79,9 @@ CONFIGUREOPTS = " --build=${BUILD_SYS} \
oe_runconf () {
if [ -x ${S}/configure ] ; then
- ${S}/configure ${CONFIGUREOPTS} ${EXTRA_OECONF} "$@"
+ ${S}/configure \
+ ${@["","--with-sysroot"][bb.data.getVar('LIBTOOL_HAS_SYSROOT', d, 1) == "yes"]} \
+ ${CONFIGUREOPTS} ${EXTRA_OECONF} "$@"
else
oefatal "no configure script found"
fi
@@ -170,8 +172,7 @@ autotools_do_install() {
oe_runmake 'DESTDIR=${D}' install
}
-PACKAGE_PREPROCESS_FUNCS += "autotools_prepackage_lamangler"
-
+PACKAGE_PREPROCESS_FUNCS += "${@['autotools_prepackage_lamangler',''][bb.data.getVar('LIBTOOL_HAS_SYSROOT', d, 1) == "yes"]}"
autotools_prepackage_lamangler () {
for i in `find ${PKGD} -name "*.la"` ; do \
sed -i -e 's:${STAGING_LIBDIR}:${libdir}:g;' \
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 1:46 [PATCH,V2 0/6] libtool 2.4 upgrade Khem Raj
2010-10-07 1:46 ` [PATCH,V2 1/6] libtool-2.4: Add recipes for libtool 2.4 Khem Raj
2010-10-07 1:46 ` [PATCH,V2 2/6] bitbake.conf: Define LIBTOOL_HAS_SYSROOT Khem Raj
2010-10-07 1:46 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2010-10-07 1:46 ` [PATCH, V2 4/6] cross.bbclass, staging.bbclass, utils.bbclass: Make sure that .la munging is not done for libtool > 2.4 Khem Raj
2010-10-07 1:46 ` [PATCH, V2 5/6] insane.bbclass: If LIBTOOL_HAS_SYSROOT is set then do not check for la insanity Khem Raj
2010-10-07 1:46 ` [PATCH, V2 6/6] gnutls_2.10.1.bb: Update to libtools 2.4 macros Khem Raj
2010-10-07 7:56 ` [PATCH,V2 0/6] libtool 2.4 upgrade Koen Kooi
2010-10-07 18:31 ` Khem Raj
2010-10-07 22:56 ` Graham Gower
2010-10-07 23:16 ` Graham Gower
2010-10-08 20:48 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-08 22:21 ` Chris Larson
2010-10-09 10:37 ` Koen Kooi
2010-10-09 11:37 ` Martin Jansa
2010-10-09 14:31 ` Khem Raj
2010-10-09 15:15 ` Koen Kooi
2010-10-09 16:45 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-11 13:13 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286415971-9960-4-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox