Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:35:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490776523.6396.407.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329072316.GA3298@jama>

On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log.report.20170328_014155.log

That used OE-core 552bd78, if I read this right:

        == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - openembedded-core ==
        latest upstream commit: 
        552bd78 wic: use kernel_dir to find systemd-efi bootloader

>     * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/ovmf/ovmf_git.bb:do_compile

http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/135202/

"gcc-ar: not found" - that should have been fixed by OE-core 23a12d87a6
"fix toolchain selection", which is included in OE-core 552bd78 and thus
should have been included in the build.

However, the error above was "Submitted on: 11/03/17 10:13", which was a
while ago and in particular before that fix.

Did ovmf really fail in the latest world build?

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.





  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-29  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-29  7:23 State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27 Martin Jansa
2017-03-29  8:35 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2017-03-29  9:14   ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2017-03-29  9:38     ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-29 10:14       ` Martin Jansa
2017-03-29 11:19         ` Patrick Ohly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1490776523.6396.407.camel@intel.com \
    --to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox