Re: Patchwork-Status via email

[akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com>]

On 02/07/2017 02:59 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:41:14AM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:10 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
>>>> please drop. this is fixed via a change in master-next.
>>>>
>>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?h=master-next&id=2e83e33c592543045a7761907d8cd62937e1e60d
>>> Let's see whether the magic keyword works :-)
>>>
>>> [Patchwork-Status: Superseded]
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/136794/
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>>>
>>> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
>>> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
>>> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
>>> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>> If it was supposed to update status on Patchwork, then it didn't work
>> it's still in "New" state.
> Jose, in your "parsemail: Set patch state from email metadata" patch you
> said that it "allows project maintainers to change a patch status
> directly from an email message".
>
> Can you clarify who the "project maintainers" are who can use this email
> interface?

The list of maintainers (if its the same list) can be found on

https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/

BTW, is there any doc on the keywords?

- armin
> What about this use case here: the original author wants to retract a
> patch. Can he do that via email and/or the web interface?
>
> I wasn't the original author and probably also no project maintainer, so
> I guess that's why my email had no effect. Can we enable some kind of
> error response for such cases?
>