From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:09:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090415190913.GA29623@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239798960-3586-3-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru>
On (15/04/09 16:35), Roman I Khimov wrote:
> Taken from http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1728
> ---
> .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> index 13579f9..db13a45 100644
> --- a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> @@ -63,4 +63,16 @@ do_stage () {
> cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/linux ${STAGING_INCDIR}/
> cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm ${STAGING_INCDIR}/
> cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm-generic ${STAGING_INCDIR}/
> + if [ "${ARCH}" == "x86_64" ]; then
> + cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm-x86_64 ${STAGING_INCDIR}/
> + cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm-i386 ${STAGING_INCDIR}/
> + fi
> +}
> +
> +do_stage_append_multilib () {
> + mkdir ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}
> + ln -s ../linux ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/linux
> + ln -s ../asm ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/asm
> + ln -s ../asm-generic ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/asm-generic
> + ln -s ../asm-i386 ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/asm-i386
> }
is there any reason not to use sanitized header like we do in do_install
even for do_stage
> --
> 1.6.2.1
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 12:33 [RFC] AMD64 and multilib support Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 01/11] Add x86_64-generic machine Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 02/11] binutils: add binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 04/11] gcc 4.2.4: add gcc-multilib64dir.patch Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 05/11] gcc-cross-initial: add multilib overrides Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 06/11] gcc-cross-intermediate: " Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 07/11] gcc-cross: " Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 08/11] glibc: move get_glibc_fpu_setting to glibc.inc Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 09/11] glibc: add initial-multilib Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:35 ` [PATCH 10/11] glibc: add multilib glibc Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] package.bbclass: add multilib libdir to search path Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 19:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] glibc: move get_glibc_fpu_setting to glibc.inc Khem Raj
2009-04-15 19:37 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] gcc 4.2.4: add gcc-multilib64dir.patch Khem Raj
2009-04-15 19:31 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-16 22:10 ` Tom Rini
2009-04-17 4:35 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-17 17:59 ` Tom Rini
2009-04-15 19:09 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2009-04-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers Roman I Khimov
2009-04-16 7:12 ` Khem Raj
2009-04-18 19:54 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] binutils: add binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch Khem Raj
2009-04-16 5:28 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-16 7:14 ` Khem Raj
2009-04-16 8:47 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-17 22:37 ` [PATCH 02/11] binutils: add?binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch Khem Raj
2009-04-18 15:44 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-21 20:22 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-23 4:42 ` [PATCH 02/11] binutils:?add?binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch Khem Raj
2009-04-23 9:37 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-27 10:28 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-28 20:02 ` [PATCH 02/11]?binutils:?add?binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch Khem Raj
2009-04-15 13:01 ` [RFC] AMD64 and multilib support Stanislav Brabec
2009-04-15 13:32 ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-04-15 13:52 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 14:23 ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-04-15 14:55 ` Roman I Khimov
2009-04-15 16:03 ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-04-16 22:11 ` Tom Rini
2009-04-17 5:05 ` Roman I Khimov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090415190913.GA29623@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox