Re: [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers

[Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1366 bytes --]

On Wednesday 15 April 2009 12:25:46 pm Roman I Khimov wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 23:09:13 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On (15/04/09 16:35), Roman I Khimov wrote:
> > > --- a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> > > +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> > > @@ -63,4 +63,16 @@ do_stage () {
> >
> > is there any reason not to use sanitized header like we do in do_install
> > even for do_stage
> 
> I think this is the way to go for newer kernels and it can be generalized in 
> some .inc for future. This approach is used now in 
> linux-libc-headers_2.6.29.bb, but 2.6.23 historically uses this kind of 
> do_stage and I don't think we should change that now.

OK. On that note can you test if your stuff works with 2.6.29 kernel headers ?
> 
> BTW, we have locally a patch modifying kernel.bbclass to also use 
> headers_install in kernel_do_stage for newer kernels. One of many things I 
> still need to prepare and push.

yeah I have always wanted something like that. However its required pretty early 
in the build phase thats why we have linux-libc-headers

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 

-- 
Khem Raj

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 204 bytes --]