From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:30:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091121183054.GA3299@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac9c93b10911211007m44955ef9uc99a0e8cf6408339@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2009/11/21 Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@gmx.net>:
> > Hi,
> > indeed, the SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz has changed on
> > http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_net/release,
> > so conf/checksums.ini is outdated, as it stands, and has to be updated:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@gmx.net>
> >
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/conf/checksums.ini b/conf/checksums.ini
> > index 784a092..e1aac1f 100644
> > --- a/conf/checksums.ini
> > +++ b/conf/checksums.ini
> > @@ -1099,8 +1099,8 @@ md5=0b5b91015d0f3bd9597e094ba67c4d65
> > sha256=a8222a274778ff16d0e3ee49a30db27a48a4d357169a915fc599a764e405e0b6
> >
> > [http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz]
> > -md5=a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156
> > -sha256=557910a4a3aeed6d10238e26b5a39b19247115a1b352580082bb15dc02ae4b8d
> > +md5=09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591
> > +sha256=7216a89d92327d2f0fe03e78f3c758a52be68c29daf8e971c226f4a3191e9ec0
> >
> > [http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_net/release/SDL_net-1.2.5.tar.gz]
> > md5=e45b1048d2747480dcc65ece4130a920
> >
> > Philip Balister schrieb:
> >>
> >> On 11/21/2009 01:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, GNUtoo wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> `/home/embedded/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz' saved [2690766/2690766]
> >>>>
> >>>> NOTE: The MD5Sums did not match. Wanted:
> >>>> 'a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156' and Got:
> >>>> '09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591'
> >>>
> >>> that second checksum is, in fact, the correct one for that tarball.
> >>> and the sha256sum in conf/checksums.ini also doesn't match the one for
> >>> that tarball. if that used to be correct, does that mean someone has
> >>> replaced a tarball with a different but identically-named one?
>
> Before committing this patch I would suggest comparing the new and the
> old version to find out what is actually causing this and what has
> been changed.
> If we just blindly change checksums we might as well abandon them.
> Also note that a change of the checksum means that everyone who has
> the file in his/her download dir will get a checksum error.
>
> For now a nack from me.
>
> As this already happened before recently (perl twig) I suggest we
> adapt a policy for this or maybe some automated removal (e.g. if you
> have a file in your downloads dir with a checksum in blacklist.ini
> that version is not used but removed or parked aside or something like
> that).
>
> Frans
As Bernhard probably hasn't old archive I tried it here
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9 $ ls -lR > lslR.txt
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9 $ cd ../SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new $ ls -lR > lslR.txt
/home/downloads/OE/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new $ cd ..
/home/downloads/OE $ diff -rq SDL_mixer-1.2.9 SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/
Files SDL_mixer-1.2.9/lslR.txt and SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/lslR.txt differ
/home/downloads/OE $ diff -r SDL_mixer-1.2.9 SDL_mixer-1.2.9.new/
All file rights are the same only dates changed from Oct 13 to Nov 7
So it looks safe.
martin@jama /home/downloads/OE $ md5sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz;
sha256sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156 SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
557910a4a3aeed6d10238e26b5a39b19247115a1b352580082bb15dc02ae4b8d
SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
martin@jama /home/downloads/OE $ md5sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz;
sha256sum SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz
09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591 SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz
7216a89d92327d2f0fe03e78f3c758a52be68c29daf8e971c226f4a3191e9ec0
SDL_mixer-1.2.9-new.tar.gz
Acked-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
--
uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr
JaMa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-21 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-21 5:55 wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9 GNUtoo
2009-11-21 6:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-11-21 14:28 ` Philip Balister
2009-11-21 17:02 ` GNUtoo
2009-11-21 17:45 ` [PATCH] " Bernhard Kaindl
2009-11-21 18:07 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-21 18:24 ` Philip Balister
2009-11-21 18:30 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2009-11-22 9:51 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-22 10:30 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-22 12:21 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-22 12:29 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-22 12:55 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-22 12:02 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-22 15:56 ` [PATCH] libsdl-mixer: delete libsdl-mixer_1.2.9.bb (as agreed upon) Bernhard Kaindl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091121183054.GA3299@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox