Re: wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

On 11/21/2009 01:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, GNUtoo wrote:
>
>> hi, I've a bad checksum for SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
>> I've tried to download it a second time and the bad checksum persist:
>> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7861/7861) [100 %]
>> NOTE: Parsing finished. 7056 cached, 461 parsed, 344 skipped, 0 masked.
>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
>> NOTE: Preparing runqueue
>> NOTE: Executing runqueue
>> NOTE: Running task 885 of 1396 (ID:
>> 209, /home/embedded/oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/libsdl/libsdl-mixer_1.2.9.bb, do_fetch)
>> NOTE: fetch http://build.shr-project.org/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
>> --2009-11-21 06:37:49--
>> http://build.shr-project.org/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
>> Resolving build.shr-project.org... 78.40.125.6
>> Connecting to build.shr-project.org|78.40.125.6|:80... connected.
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
>> 2009-11-21 06:37:50 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>
>> NOTE: fetch
>> http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
>> --2009-11-21 06:37:50--
>> http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
>> Resolving www.libsdl.org... 69.163.143.10
>> Connecting to www.libsdl.org|69.163.143.10|:80... connected.
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>> Length: 2690766 (2.6M) [application/x-tar]
>> Saving to: `/home/embedded/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz'
>>
>> 100%[====[...]=====================>] 2,690,766    746K/s   in 4.5s
>>
>> 2009-11-21 06:38:00 (588 KB/s) -
>> `/home/embedded/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz' saved [2690766/2690766]
>>
>> NOTE: The MD5Sums did not match. Wanted:
>> 'a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156' and Got:
>> '09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591'
>
>    that second checksum is, in fact, the correct one for that tarball.
> and the sha256sum in conf/checksums.ini also doesn't match the one for
> that tarball.  if that used to be correct, does that mean someone has
> replaced a tarball with a different but identically-named one?

It can also mean the download is corrupt, try removing the file (and the 
.md5 file) from the OE sources dir and restarting the build.

Philip


>
> rday
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
>              Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
>
> Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
> ========================================================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>