Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:50:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610205040.GW14941@mx.loc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinAFdiBJ6jN3WwY75KsNwTPmkyoOL0iTgJ8UPFC@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:27:36PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote:

>> If you start factoring MACHINE_FEATURES into that kind of decision then,
>> logically, the package needs to have PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE}.  I don't
>> think it would be a very good thing to start forcing packages down that
>> path unnecessarily.

This is unavoidable for certain special setups, isn't it.
>
>
>Fair enough, that seems reasonable for this particular case.  Now that you
>bring it up, we adjust package arch to machine when we use a machine
>specific file:// file, but maybe we need to teach it to check for references
>to MACHINE_FEATURES or COMBINED_FEATURES, somehow.

Both mmu and floatingpoint will need to look at COMBINED_FEATURES.
At least for mmu vs. !mmu PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE} is unavoidable, no?



  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-10 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-21 15:31 [PATCH] uClibc: rename main include Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-02-22  5:54 ` Khem Raj
2010-03-12 17:46   ` [RFC, PATCH 0/3] uClibc recipe touchup Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-03-12 17:46   ` [PATCH 1/3] uClibc: rename include file of old releases Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-03-12 17:46   ` [PATCH 2/3] sane-toolchain: add PREFERRED_UCLIBC_VERSION Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-04-05 19:49     ` Roman I Khimov
2010-04-08  9:30       ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-06-09 17:11         ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-03-12 17:46   ` [PATCH 3/3] uClibc: redo configuration Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-04-05 20:22     ` Roman I Khimov
2010-06-09 17:10   ` [PATCH 0/3] uClibc configury touchup; RFC WRT feature/dep picking heuristics Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 21:26     ` RFC " Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 17:10   ` [PATCH 1/3] uClibc: redo configuration Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 17:10   ` [PATCH 2/3] uclibc_git: keep PV at "git" Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 17:10   ` [PATCH 3/3] busybox: picking IPv6 per default is not up to the package Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 18:44     ` Phil Blundell
2010-06-09 18:52       ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 19:18         ` Phil Blundell
2010-06-09 19:32           ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-09 20:22             ` Phil Blundell
2010-06-10 19:46               ` [PATCH 1/2] uclibc: handle DISTRO_FEATURE="largefile" Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-10 19:46               ` [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-10 19:55                 ` Chris Larson
2010-06-10 20:22                   ` Phil Blundell
2010-06-10 20:27                     ` Chris Larson
2010-06-10 20:50                       ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [this message]
2010-06-10 21:06                         ` Phil Blundell
2010-06-10 21:20                           ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-11 12:59                             ` Phil Blundell
2010-06-22 20:39                               ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-28 18:23                                 ` ping**2 [was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES] Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-10 22:56                       ` [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES Khem Raj
2010-06-11  7:16                         ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-10 20:44                     ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2010-06-10 21:09                       ` Phil Blundell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100610205040.GW14941@mx.loc \
    --to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox