From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Latest binutils-cross-2.20.1-r10.0 build issue with binutils-2.20.1 on gentoo host
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:59:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629215920.GD12539@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimYL2e7H6guEY3NMVq5SZoqeCf_ajxKWf0J_C9k@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@inbox.ru> wrote:
> > On 11:13 Tue 08 Jun , Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@inbox.ru> wrote:
> >> > On 23:14 Mon 07 Jun , Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > FYI:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you run into issue
> >> >> > ar: can't set BFD default target to `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu': Invalid bfd target
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Like I did in:
> >> >> > http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/packages/601631/
> >> >> >
> >> > Yup. I got this breakage too, only binutils-cross version is 2.18-r10.2
> >> > and error is:
> >> > ar: can't set BFD default target to `i686-pc-linux-gnu': Invalid bfd target
> >> >
> >> > see for example http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/packages/602258/
> >> >
> >> > Though I didn't dig into problem deeply and simply workaround it by
> >> > reverting 208ece17f76686e0faa44b2a9223fcadb692a991
> >> > But I'll gladly test any patches fixing the issue (whatever it is) in a
> >> > proper way.
> >>
> >> proper way is to fix binutils on your host.
> >
> > Ahh, sorry - misread original Martin's post. So it's seems to be
> > Gentoo-specific problem (yes, my OE is on Gentoo too).
> > Still wondering why it worked before and how it's connected with adding
> > "--enable-shared" in 208ece17f766. Weird, because it breaks on building
> > static library.
>
> it is a latent problem in there which just gets exposed with this change.
Just for reference there is gentoo bug I reported
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323319
now it's closed as INVALID
which is not 100% right imho as that broken patch (broken only with
multitarget is applied in ebuild) and --enable-plugins is task for
eclass not upstream.. but you can fix it locally..
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-29 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-05 20:40 Latest binutils-cross-2.20.1-r10.0 build issue with binutils-2.20.1 on gentoo host Martin Jansa
2010-06-07 21:14 ` Martin Jansa
2010-06-08 17:20 ` Dmitry Artamonow
2010-06-08 18:13 ` Khem Raj
2010-06-08 20:05 ` Dmitry Artamonow
2010-06-08 21:15 ` Khem Raj
2010-06-29 21:59 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100629215920.GD12539@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox